Moore's paradox revisited

@article{Linville1991MooresPR,
  title={Moore's paradox revisited},
  author={Kent Linville and Merrill Ring},
  journal={Synthese},
  year={1991},
  volume={87},
  pages={295-309}
}

Wittgensteinian Accounts of Moorean Absurdity

Etude des differentes explications de la definition mooreenne de l'absurdite attribuees a Wittgenstein dans les termes suivants: l'aveu d'une croyance au meme titre que les affirmations, l'approche

The ontological turn revisited: Theoretical decline. Why cannot ontologists fulfil their promise?

Holbraad and Pedersen have revisited the ontological turn, suggesting that it is strictly concerned with methodology only. Holbraad goes even further, accepting an aesthetic criterion for ethnography

An expressivist solution to Moorean paradoxes

The paper analyzes the nature and scope of Moore’s paradox, articulates the desiderata of a successful solution and claims that psychological expressivism best meets these desiderata. After a brief

An examination for the Unexpected Hanging Paradox

Having reflected on his sentence, the prisoner draws the conclusion that he will escape from the hanging. His reasoning is in several parts. He begins by concluding that the "surprise hanging" can't

Moore's Problem

Moore’s problem or Moore’s ‘paradox’ arises from the fact that consistent propositions of the form of (1) and (2): (1) It is raining but I believe it is not raining (2) It is raining but I don’t

Interpretando la Paradoja de Moore: la irracionalidad de una oración mooreana

This paper offers an interpretation of Moore's Paradox that emphasizes its relevance for our understanding of rationality and linguistic interpretation. The sentences that originate the paradox do

Moorean absurdities and the nature of assertion

This article may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution , reselling , loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or