Monetary Intervention Mitigated Banking Panics during the Great Depression: Quasi‐Experimental Evidence from a Federal Reserve District Border, 1929–1933

@article{Richardson2009MonetaryIM,
  title={Monetary Intervention Mitigated Banking Panics during the Great Depression: Quasi‐Experimental Evidence from a Federal Reserve District Border, 1929–1933},
  author={Gary A. Richardson and William Troost},
  journal={Journal of Political Economy},
  year={2009},
  volume={117},
  pages={1031 - 1073}
}
The Federal Reserve Act divided Mississippi between the 6th (Atlanta) and 8th (St. Louis) Districts. During the Great Depression, these districts’ policies differed. Atlanta championed monetary activism and the extension of aid to ailing banks. St. Louis eschewed expansionary initiatives. During a banking crisis in 1930, Atlanta expedited lending to banks in need. St. Louis did not. Outcomes differed across districts. In Atlanta, banks survived at higher rates, lending continued at higher… Expand

Paper Mentions

Monetary Intervention Really Did Mitigate Banking Panics During the Great Depression: Evidence Along the Atlanta Federal Reserve District Border
This paper argues that monetary intervention alleviated banking panics during the early stages of the Great Depression. Throughout the course of the depression, the Federal Reserve Bank of AtlantaExpand
Arresting Banking Panics: Federal Reserve Liquidity Provision and the Forgotten Panic of 1929
Scholars differ on whether central bank intervention mitigates banking panics. In April 1929, a fruit fly infestation in Florida forced the U.S. government to quarantine fruit shipments from theExpand
Shadowy Banks and Financial Contagion during the Great Depression: A Retrospective on Friedman and Schwartz
This essay assesses whether network linkages within the banking system amplified the real effects of bank failures during the Great Contraction. In 1929, nearly all interbank deposits held by FederalExpand
Identifying the Effects of Bank Failures from a Natural Experiment in Mississippi during the Great Depression
I examine the causal effect of bank failures during the Great Depression using the quasi-experimental setup of Richardson and Troost (2009). The experiment is based on Mississippi being divided intoExpand
Regional Monetary Policies and the Great Depression
The Great Depression provides a unique setting to test the impact of monetary policies on economic activity in a monetary union within the same country during a severe crisis. Until the mid-1930s,Expand
Arresting Banking Panics: Fed Liquidity Provision and the Forgotten Panic of 1929
Scholars differ on whether Federal Reserve intervention mitigated banking panics during the Great Depression and in recent years. The last panic prior to the Depression sheds light on this debate. InExpand
Banking-Crisis Interventions, 1257 - 2019
We present a new database of banking-crisis interventions since the 13th century. The database includes 1886 interventions in 20 categories across 138 countries, covering interventions during all ofExpand
The Lender of Last Resort: Lessons from the Fed's First 100 Years
We review the responses of the Federal Reserve to financial crises over the past 100 years. The authors of the Federal Reserve Act in 1913 created an institution that they hoped would prevent bankingExpand
Payments Crises and Consequences
TLDR
The findings suggest policies that ensure banks continue to process payments during contractions – including the bailouts of financial institutions in 2008 and the unprecedented support of the financial system during the COVID crisis – have substantial value. Expand
The Real Effects of Fed Intervention During the 1920-1921 Depression
We provide novel evidence of how discount rates affected lending and output during and after the 1920-1921 depression. Our identification strategy exploits county-level variation in access to theExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 69 REFERENCES
Monetary Intervention Mitigated Banking Panics During the Great Depression: Quasi-Experimental Evidence from the Federal Reserve District Border in Mississippi, 1929 to 1933
The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 divided Mississippi between the 6th (Atlanta) and 8th (St. Louis) Federal Reserve Districts. Before and during the Great Depression, these districts' policiesExpand
Bank Distress During the Great Contraction, 1929 to 1933, New Data from the Archives of the Board of Governors
During the contraction from 1929 through 1933, the Federal Reserve System tracked changes in the status of all banks operating in the United States and determined the cause of each bank suspension.Expand
Categories and causes of bank distress during the great depression, 1929-1933: The illiquidity versus insolvency debate revisited
During the contraction from 1929 to 1933, the Federal Reserve System tracked changes in the status of all banks operating in the United States and determined the cause of each bank suspension. ThisExpand
Bank Distress During the Great Depression: The Illiquidity-Insolvency Debate Revisited
During the contraction from 1929 through 1933, the Federal Reserve System tracked changes in the status of all banks operating in the United States and determined the cause of each bank suspension.Expand
Are Prudential Supervision and Regulation Pillars of Financial Stability? Evidence from the Great Depression
  • K. Mitchener
  • Business, Economics
  • The Journal of Law and Economics
  • 2007
Drawing on the variation in financial distress across U.S. states during the Great Depression, this article suggests how bank supervision and regulation affected banking stability during the GreatExpand
The banking panics of the Great Depression
This is the first full-length study of five US banking panics of the Great Depression. Previous studies of the Depression have approached the banking panics from a macroeconomic viewpoint; ProfessorExpand
Contagion and Bank Failures During the Great Depression: The June 1932 Chicago Banking Panic
Studies of pre-Depression banking argue that banking panics resulted from depositor confusion about the incidence of shocks, and that interbank cooperation avoided unwarranted failures. This paperExpand
Member Bank Borrowing and the Fed's Contractionary Monetary Policy during the Great Depression
This paper examines the causes of Federal Reserve policy errors during the Great Depression. It finds compelling evidence that the Fed developed a flawed strategy during the 1920s, and continued toExpand
Quarterly Data on the Categories and Causes of Bank Distress During the Great Depression
During the contraction from 1929 to 1933, the Federal Reserve System tracked changes in the status of all banks operating in the United States and determined the cause of each bank suspension. ThisExpand
Fundamentals, Panics and Bank Distress During the Depression
We assemble bank-level and other data for Fed member banks to model determinants of bank failure. Fundamentals explain bank failure risk well. The first two Friedman-Schwartz crises are notExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...