# Moduli and canonical forms for linear dynamical systems II: The topological case

@article{Hazewinkel2005ModuliAC,
title={Moduli and canonical forms for linear dynamical systems II: The topological case},
author={M. Hazewinkel},
journal={Mathematical systems theory},
year={2005},
volume={10},
pages={363-385}
}
• M. Hazewinkel
• Published 2005
• Mathematics, Computer Science, Physics
• Mathematical systems theory
• AbstractIn this paper we study real linear dynamical systems $$\dot x = Fx + Gu,y = Hx,x \in R^n$$ = state space,u ∈Rm = input space,y ∈Rp = output space, under the equivalence relation induced by base change in state space; or in other words we study triples of matrices with real coefficients (F, G, H) of sizesn × n, n × m, p × n respectively, under the action(F, G, H.) →(TFT−1,TG, HT−1) ofGLn(R), the group of invertible realn × n matrices. One of the central questions studied is: “do there… CONTINUE READING
21 Citations

#### Topics from this paper

Bundle Reduction and the Alignment Distance on Spaces of State-Space LTI Systems
• Mathematics, Computer Science
• IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
• 2017
• 4
• Highly Influenced
• PDF
A continuous canonical form for static output feedback in linear system
• Mathematics
• 2012 12th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems
• 2012
Riemannian Optimal Identification Method for Linear Systems With Symmetric Positive-Definite Matrix
• Mathematics, Computer Science
• IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
• 2020
• 1
• PDF

#### References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 27 REFERENCES
Canonical Forms and Moduli for Linear, Constant, Finite Dimensional, Dynamical Systems
• Proc. CNR-CISM symposium on "Algebraic System Theory
• 1975
(R), x-> cf>ab(f(x)) fa: V~ x R"-> V~ x R
) denote the set of isomorphism classes of completely reachable families of linear systems (of dimensions (n, m, p)) over S. Now let/: S'-+ S be a continuous map
) iflab(s)aa(s)R(Fa,., Ga,)= R(F,(f(s)), G0 (f(s)))iJ 1 R(F)f(s))
11) then mean that F
• · p(R) be the n-vectorbundle obtained by glueing together the E, by means of the \$
8) implies that R(Fa,s• Ga.sl. has nonzero determinant)