Modes of Thought.

  title={Modes of Thought.},
  author={Radoslav Andrea Tsanoff and Alfred North Whitehead},
  journal={The Philosophical Review},
Modes of Thought provides readers with an opportunity to think deeply about their own thinking  how we take the world. Whitehead teaches that the world comes at us as processes and activities, not as things or events. Moreover, the processes we seek to make sense of come at us as abstracted fragments described in our own words. To understand the whole, we must develop a method of thought  steeped in an awareness that our thought processes, the categories of language we use, can distort our… 

Culture and systems of thought: holistic versus analytic cognition.

The authors find East Asians to be holistic, attending to the entire field and assigning causality to it, making relatively little use of categories and formal logic, and relying on "dialectical"

Liberation and its Constraints: A Philosophical Analysis of Key Issues in Psychiatry

There can be no question that we are living in a post-Husserlian and post-Freudian world. Their modernist dream, consistent with Enlightenment ideals, was to create a perfectible science of

Mind, Media, and Memory: The Archival and Epistemic Functions of Written Text

This paper is concerned with a question that originally took form in the writings of McLuhan (1962, 1964), Havelock (1963), and Goody and Watt (1963). The question is this: Has our new understanding

The Rhythm of the University: Part Two - Whitehead's Break with the Mechanistic Materialism of 17th Century Science

In this second article on the rhythm of the university, I concentrate on Alfred North Whitehead's theory of a distinctive rhythm of research. The narrow assumptions of 17th century science, which

History, Humanity and the Activity of God

Towards the end of Way to Wisdom, after noting how specialization has fragmented modern thought, Karl Jaspers writes that One might wish for a philosophy that would encompass and assimilate the whole

Is Nature Habit-Forming?

The term “habit” as used in ordinary speech means a wide range of things. However, as used by C. S. Peirce, “habit” is generalized to such an extent that it seems to require a radical change in our

Implicit Theories: Elaboration and Extension of the Model

We found these commentaries to be deeply thoughtful and thought-provoking. Not only were we led down new paths, but we were also led to reexplore the old ones. In addition, it was gratifying to see

The challenge of knowledge soup

having a socio-cultural foundation. But, I think, this does not by any means make it less objective, since externalizing by reencoding is the only means of making private subjective knowledge public