Modern Science and Zeno's Paradoxes

@inproceedings{Grnbaum1968ModernSA,
  title={Modern Science and Zeno's Paradoxes},
  author={Adolf Gr{\"u}nbaum},
  year={1968}
}
Why Zeno’s Paradoxes of Motion are Actually About Immobility
Zeno’s paradoxes of motion, allegedly denying motion, have been conceived to reinforce the Parmenidean vision of an immutable world. The aim of this article is to demonstrate that these famous
Pourquoi les paradoxes de Zénon ne remettent pas en question le mouvement mais plutôt l’immobilité
Les paradoxes du mouvement de Zenon pretendent nier l’existence du mouvement. En effet, ils ont ete concus dans le seul but de consolider la vision Parmenideenne d’un monde immuable et sans
Meso-level Objects, Powers, and Simultaneous Causation
Abstract I argue that Mumford and Anjum’s recent theory of simultaneous causation among powerful meso-level objects is problematic in several respects: it is based on a false dichotomy, it is
An Essay in Honor of Adolf Grünbaum’s Ninetieth Birthday: A Reexamination of Zeno’s Paradox of Extension
We suggest that, far from establishing an inconsistency in the standard theory of the geometrical linear continuum, Zeno’s Paradox of Extension merely establishes an inconsistency between the
Mathematics, Models, and Zeno’s Paradoxes of Motion
A version of nonstandard analysis, Internal Set Theory, has been used to provide a resolution of Zeno’s paradoxes of motion. This resolution is inadequate because the application of Internal Set
Symmetric and asymmetric theories of time
There is a feeling of dissatisfaction with the traditional way of defining the A-theories of time. One reason is that these definitions rest on an ontological question—‘Do the future and the past
Feeling the past: beyond causal content
Memories often come with a feeling of pastness. The events we remember strike us as having occurred in our past. What accounts for this feeling of pastness? In his recent book, Memory: A
22 Thomson ’ s lamp revisited
  • Philosophy
  • 2020
-The argument of Thomson lamp and Benacerraf’s critique are reexamined from the perspective of the w-order legitimated by the hypothesis of the actual infinity subsumed into the Axiom of Infinite.
Presentism and the MicroStructure of Time
The standard account of the micro-structure of time is based on Cantor’s conception of continuity and thus views the time line as consisting of undenumerably many instants ordered by the B-theoretic
How (not) to judge a theory of causation
Philosophical theories of causation are commonly judged by their ability to correctly determine whether there is a causal relation present in intuitively clear example scenarios. If the theories
...
...