Moderators of the relationship between implicit and explicit evaluation.

@article{Nosek2005ModeratorsOT,
  title={Moderators of the relationship between implicit and explicit evaluation.},
  author={Brian A. Nosek},
  journal={Journal of experimental psychology. General},
  year={2005},
  volume={134 4},
  pages={
          565-84
        }
}
  • Brian A. Nosek
  • Published 2005
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • Journal of experimental psychology. General
Automatic and controlled modes of evaluation sometimes provide conflicting reports of the quality of social objects. This article presents evidence for 4 moderators of the relationship between automatic (implicit) and controlled (explicit) evaluations. Implicit and explicit preferences were measured for a variety of object pairs using a large sample. The average correlation was r=.36, and 52 of the 57 object pairs showed a significant positive correlation. Results of multilevel modeling… Expand

Tables from this paper

A Comparative Investigation of Seven Implicit Measures of Social Cognition
What moderates implicit—explicit consistency?
Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity.
Methodological and Dispositional Predictors of Congruence Between Implicit and Explicit Need for Achievement
Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes
A comparative investigation of seven indirect attitude measures
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 90 REFERENCES
A Meta-Analysis on the Correlation Between the Implicit Association Test and Explicit Self-Report Measures
Implicit measures in social cognition. research: their meaning and use.
Attitude Importance as a Moderator of the Relationship Between Implicit and Explicit Attitude Measures
Using the implicit association test to measure self-esteem and self-concept.
Understanding and Using the Implicit Association Test: II. Method Variables and Construct Validity
Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice
...
1
2
3
4
5
...