Models and Statistical Inference: The Controversy between Fisher and Neyman–Pearson

@article{Lenhard2006ModelsAS,
  title={Models and Statistical Inference: The Controversy between Fisher and Neyman–Pearson},
  author={J. Lenhard},
  journal={The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science},
  year={2006},
  volume={57},
  pages={69 - 91}
}
  • J. Lenhard
  • Published 2006
  • Sociology
  • The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
The main thesis of the paper is that in the case of modern statistics, the differences between the various concepts of models were the key to its formative controversies. The mathematical theory of statistical inference was mainly developed by Ronald A. Fisher, Jerzy Neyman, and Egon S. Pearson. Fisher on the one side and Neyman–Pearson on the other were involved often in a polemic controversy. The common view is that Neyman and Pearson made Fisher's account more stringent mathematically. It is… Expand
67 Citations
Should The Widest Cleft in Statistics - How and Why Fisher opposed Neyman and Pearson
  • 1
Should The Widest Cleft in Statistics-How and Why Fisher opposed Neyman and Pearson
  • 3
  • PDF
Significance Testing Needs a Taxonomy
  • 6
  • PDF
Before p < 0.05 to Beyond p < 0.05: Using History to Contextualize p-Values and Significance Testing
  • 15
Toward Machine Wald
  • 8
  • PDF
The earth is flat (p > 0.05): significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research
  • 133
  • PDF
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 48 REFERENCES
THE LOGIC OF STATISTICAL INFERENCE1
  • G. Barnard
  • Computer Science
  • The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
  • 1972
  • 269
Modelling Populations: Pearson and Fisher on Mendelism and Biometry
  • M. Morrison
  • Sociology
  • The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
  • 2002
  • 38
The Dappled World
  • 173
  • Highly Influential
  • PDF
...
1
2
3
4
5
...