• Corpus ID: 60380860

Modelling Legal Argument: Reasoning with Cases and Hypotheticals, a Thesis Proposal.

@inproceedings{Ashley1986ModellingLA,
  title={Modelling Legal Argument: Reasoning with Cases and Hypotheticals, a Thesis Proposal.},
  author={Kevin D. Ashley},
  year={1986}
}
Abstract : This thesis proposal outlines a program, HYPO, to model reasoning with cases and hypotheticals. The program comprises a means of representing and indexing cases in a Case Knowledge Base (CKB), a computational definition of relevance in terms of dimensions which capture the utility of a case for making a particular kind of argument, a dimension-based method for other cases, for making and responding to points in an argument, for asking pertinent questions and for generating… 
Representation of case law for argumentative reasoning
TLDR
The final result is ANGELIC (ADF for kNowledGe Encapsulation of Legal Information from Cases), a method for producing programs that decide the cases with a high degree of accuracy in multiple domains.
Argumentation Schemes for Reasoning about Factors with Dimensions
TLDR
This paper examines how dimensions as used in the HYPO system can provide grounds on which to argue about which factors should apply to a case and advances the overall account of reasoning with legal cases and make it more robust.
Towards Annotating and Extracting Textual Legal Case Factors
Case based reasoning is a crucial aspect of common law practice, where lawyers select precedent cases which they use to argue for or against a decision in a current case. To select the precedents,
Artificial Intelligence and Legal Reasoning: A Discussion of the Field and Gardner's Book
TLDR
The emerging field of artificial intelligence and legal reasoning is discussed, some of which seem tantalizingly tractable with currently well-understood methodologies such as those of expert systems, and others seem to subsume exceedingly hard problems such as natural language understanding.
A formalization of argumentation schemes for legal case-based reasoning in ASPIC+
In this article we offer a formal account of reasoning with legal cases in terms of argumentation schemes. These schemes, and undercutting attacks associated with them, are formalized as defeasible
The case for cases : a call for purity in case-based reasoningRobert
A basic premise of case-based reasoning (CBR) is that it involves reasoning from cases, which are representations of real episodes, rather than from rules, which are facts and if then structures with
On the role of prototypes in appellate legal argument (abstract)
Although most of the work on Artificial Intelligence and Law today is oriented towards the development of pract ical systems, there is a small group of researchers who are primarily interested in
Combining Case-Based and Rule-Based Reasoning: A Heuristic Approach
TLDR
A heuristically controlled approach to combining reasoning with cases and reasoning with rules, and the need for melding case-based and rule-based reasoning on statutory interpretation problems is described.
Evaluating an Approach to Reasoning with Cases Using Abstract Dialectical Frameworks
TLDR
Ease of implementation, the efficacy of the resulting program, ease of refinement of the program, transparency of the reasoning, relation to formal argumentation techniques, and transferability across domains are evaluated.
Data-centric and logic-based models for automated legal problem solving
TLDR
This paper distinguishes representative legal tasks to which each approach appears to be particularly well suited and proposes a hybrid model that exploits the complementarity of each.
...
...