Modeling and Prediction of the Impact Factor of Journals Using Open-Access Databases

@article{Templ2020ModelingAP,
  title={Modeling and Prediction of the Impact Factor of Journals Using Open-Access Databases},
  author={Matthias Templ},
  journal={Austrian Journal of Statistics},
  year={2020}
}
  • M. Templ
  • Published 19 June 2020
  • Computer Science
  • Austrian Journal of Statistics
This article is motivated by the work as editor-in-chief of the Austrian Journal of Statistics and contains detailed analyses about the impact of the Austrian Journal of Statistics. The impact of a journal is typically expressed by journal metrics indicators. One of the important ones, the journal impact factor is calculated from the Web of Science (WoS) database by Clarivate Analytics. It is known that newly established journals or journals without membership in big publishers often face… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 47 REFERENCES
Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis
TLDR
It is argued that these metrics provide additional advantages over the JIF and that the free availability of GS allows for a democratization of citation analysis as it provides every academic access to citation data regardless of their institution's financial means.
To What Extent is Inclusion in the Web of Science an Indicator of Journal 'Quality'?
The assessment of research based on the journal in which it is published is a widely adopted practice. Some research assessments use the Web of Science (WoS) to identify ‘high quality’ journals,
The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis
TLDR
Results indicate that the use of either WoS or Scopus for research evaluation may introduce biases that favor Natural Sciences and Engineering as well as Biomedical Research to the detriment of Social Sciences and Arts and Humanities.
A New Era in Citation and Bibliometric Analyses: Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar
TLDR
The strengths and weaknesses of WoS, Scopus, and GS, their overlap and uniqueness, quality and language of the citations, and the implications of the findings for citation analysis are discussed.
Ranking journals: could Google Scholar Metrics be an alternative to Journal Citation Reports and Scimago Journal Rank?
TLDR
Despite its shortcomings, Google Scholar Metrics is a helpful tool for authors and editors in identifying core journals and as an increasingly useful tool for ranking scientific journals, it may also challenge established journals products.
Google Scholar as a data source for research assessment
TLDR
It is concluded that Google Scholar presents a broader view of the academic world because it has brought to light a great amount of sources that were not previously visible.
Journals that increase their impact factor at least fourfold in a few years: The role of journal self-citations
TLDR
The aim of this study was to ascertain the possible effect of journal self-citations on the increase in the impact factors of journals in which this scientometric indicator rose by a factor of at least four in only a few years and found no proof of widespread manipulation of the impact factor.
Citation Analysis: Comparison of Web of Science®, Scopus™, SciFinder®, and Google Scholar
TLDR
The citation analysis potential of four databases is compared: Web of Science, Scopus, SciFinder, and Google Scholar; each database presents its own strengths and weaknesses, including methods of analysis, differences in coverage, and means of linking references.
A Criteria-based Assessment of the Coverage of Scopus and Web of Science
TLDR
The relative coverages of Scopus and Web of Science are compared with regard to publication type, field of research and language and the results show that Scopus covers 72 percent of the total Norwegian scientific and scholarly publication output in 2015 and 2016.
...
...