Mitochondrial Replacement: Ethics And Identity

Abstract

Mitochondrial replacement techniques (MRTs) have the potential to allow prospective parents who are at risk of passing on debilitating or even life-threatening mitochondrial disorders to have healthy children to whom they are genetically related. Ethical concerns have however been raised about these techniques. This article focuses on one aspect of the ethical debate, the question of whether there is any moral difference between the two types of MRT proposed: Pronuclear Transfer (PNT) and Maternal Spindle Transfer (MST). It examines how questions of identity impact on the ethical evaluation of each technique and argues that there is an important difference between the two. PNT, it is argued, is a form of therapy based on embryo modification while MST is, instead, an instance of selective reproduction. The article's main ethical conclusion is that, in some circumstances, there is a stronger obligation to use PNT than MST.

DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12187

Extracted Key Phrases

0204020162017
Citations per Year

Citation Velocity: 14

Averaging 14 citations per year over the last 2 years.

Learn more about how we calculate this metric in our FAQ.

Cite this paper

@inproceedings{Wrigley2015MitochondrialRE, title={Mitochondrial Replacement: Ethics And Identity}, author={Anthony Wrigley and Stephen M Wilkinson and John B. Appleby}, booktitle={Bioethics}, year={2015} }