Mitigation potential and global health impacts from emissions pricing of food commodities

@article{Springmann2017MitigationPA,
  title={Mitigation potential and global health impacts from emissions pricing of food commodities},
  author={Marco Springmann and Daniel Mason-D’Croz and Sherman Robinson and Keith Wiebe and H. Charles J. Godfray and Mike Rayner and Peter Scarborough},
  journal={Nature Climate Change},
  year={2017},
  volume={7},
  pages={69-74}
}
The projected rise in food-related greenhouse gas emissions could seriously impede efforts to limit global warming to acceptable levels. Despite that, food production and consumption have long been excluded from climate policies, in part due to concerns about the potential impact on food security. Using a coupled agriculture and health modelling framework, we show that the global climate change mitigation potential of emissions pricing of food commodities could be substantial, and that levying… 
Reducing greenhouse gas emissions in agriculture without compromising food security?
To keep global warming possibly below 1.5 °C and mitigate adverse effects of climate change, agriculture, like all other sectors, will have to contribute to efforts in achieving net negative
Risk of increased food insecurity under stringent global climate change mitigation policy
Food insecurity can be directly exacerbated by climate change due to crop-production-related impacts of warmer and drier conditions that are expected in important agricultural regions1–3. However,
Evaluating the regional risks to food availability and access from land-based climate policies in an integrated assessment model
Mitigating greenhouse gas emissions is necessary to reduce the overall negative climate change impacts on crop yields and agricultural production. However, certain mitigation measures may generate
Potential of Meat Substitutes for Climate Change Mitigation and Improved Human Health in High-Income Markets
The global food system contributes approximately one-quarter of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, with these dominated by the livestock sector. The projected increase in livestock demand is likely to
Changing Agricultural Systems and Food Diets to Prevent and Mitigate Global Health Shocks
No one would dispute that agricultural systems and food diets are not sustainable from an environmental and health point of view, and that increasing their sustainability must be a major objective of
Can a Greenhouse Gas Emissions Tax on Food also Be Healthy and Equitable? A Systemised Review and Modelling Study from Aotearoa New Zealand
TLDR
Applying taxes that target foods with high GHG emissions has the potential to be effective for reducingGHG emissions and to result in co-benefits for population health.
Can a greenhouse gas emissions tax on food also be healthy and equitable? A systematized review and modelling study from Aotearoa New Zealand
TLDR
Applying taxes that target foods with high GHG emissions has the potential to be effective for reducingGHG emissions and to result in co-benefits for population health, and combining a GHG food tax with a fruit and vegetable subsidy may help reduce the negative effects on household food expenditure of such a tax.
Impacts of GHG emissions abatement measures on agricultural market and food security
Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land-use (AFOLU) are thought to play a vital role in long-term GHG emissions reduction, especially for their importance in non-CO2 emissions, bioenergy supply and
A multi-model assessment of food security implications of climate change mitigation
Holding the global increase in temperature caused by climate change well below 2 °C above pre-industrial levels, the goal affirmed by the Paris Agreement, is a major societal challenge. Meanwhile,
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 90 REFERENCES
Greenhouse gas taxes on animal food products: rationale, tax scheme and climate mitigation effects
Agriculture is responsible for 25–30% of global anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions but has thus far been largely exempted from climate policies. Because of high monitoring costs and
Global climate policy impacts on livestock, land use, livelihoods, and food security
TLDR
An integrated assessment of the linkages between land-based climate policies, development, and food security, with a particular emphasis on abatement opportunities and impacts in the livestock sector, finds that forest carbon sequestration incentives to non-Annex I countries can eliminate leakage rates for livestock production and agriculture as a whole.
Climate Change and Food Systems
Food systems contribute 19%–29% of global anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, releasing 9,800–16,900 megatonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (MtCO2e) in 2008. Agricultural production,
Climate change mitigation through livestock system transitions
TLDR
Fostering transitions toward more productive livestock production systems in combination with climate policies targeting the land-use change appears to be the most efficient lever to deliver desirable climate and food availability outcomes.
Analysis and valuation of the health and climate change cobenefits of dietary change
TLDR
It is found that the impacts of dietary changes toward less meat and more plant-based diets vary greatly among regions, and the largest absolute environmental and health benefits result from diet shifts in developing countries whereas Western high-income and middle-income countries gain most in per capita terms.
Greenhouse gas mitigation potentials in the livestock sector
The livestock sector supports about 1.3 billion producers and retailers, and contributes 40-50% of agricultural GDP. We estimated that between 1995 and 2005, the livestock sector was responsible for
Reducing emissions from agriculture to meet the 2 °C target
TLDR
A preliminary global target for reducing emissions from agriculture of ~1 GtCO2 e yr-1 by 2030 to limit warming in 2100 to 2 °C above pre-industrial levels is identified.
...
...