Minimally important difference for the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form.

@article{Skolarus2015MinimallyID,
  title={Minimally important difference for the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form.},
  author={Ted A. Skolarus and Rodney L. Dunn and Martin G. Sanda and Peter D. Chang and Thomas K Greenfield and Mark S. Litwin and John T. Wei},
  journal={Urology},
  year={2015},
  volume={85 1},
  pages={
          101-5
        }
}
OBJECTIVE To establish a score threshold that constitutes a clinically relevant change for each domain of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Short Form (EPIC-26). Although its use in clinical practice and clinical trials has increased worldwide, the clinical interpretation of this 26-item disease-specific patient-reported quality of life questionnaire for men with localized prostate cancer would be facilitated by characterization of score thresholds for clinically relevant… CONTINUE READING

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 49 CITATIONS

Caution with Use of the EPIC-50 Urinary Bother Scale: How Voiding Dysfunction Modifies its Performance.

  • The Journal of urology
  • 2017
VIEW 9 EXCERPTS
CITES BACKGROUND & RESULTS
HIGHLY INFLUENCED

The Comparative Harms of Open and Robotic Prostatectomy in Population Based Samples.

  • The Journal of urology
  • 2016
VIEW 3 EXCERPTS
CITES BACKGROUND
HIGHLY INFLUENCED