Mind in a Physical World: An Essay on the Mind-Body Problem and Mental Causation

  title={Mind in a Physical World: An Essay on the Mind-Body Problem and Mental Causation},
  author={Jaegwon Kim},
Part 1 The mind-body problem - where we now are: supervenience, realization and emergence supervenience is not a mind-body theory the layered model and mereological supervenience physical realization physical realization explains mind-body supervenience. Part 2 The many problems of mental causation: three problems of mental causation the supervenience argument, or Descartes's revenge Searle, Fodor and the supervenience argument Block's worries about second-order properties. Part 3 Mental… 
Realization and Causal Role-Playing: An Essay on the Mind/Body Problem
In this dissertation I argue that one of the central ideas of late twentieth and early twenty-first century philosophy of mind -that the mind/body relation is the so-called “realization” relation,
Mental Causation In a Physical Brain
Mental causation is a philosophical concept attempting to d escribe the causal effect of the immaterial mind on subjectś behavior. Va ious types of causality have different interpretations in the
Problems of Mental Causation - Whether and How It Can Exist A Review of Jaegwon Kim's Mind in a Physical World
There is a tension or even contradiction between mental causation the belief that some mental events or properties are causally relevant for some physical events or properties and the irreducibility
The so-called problem of mental causation as discussed in the recent literature raises three central challenges for an adequate solution from a physicalist perspective: the threat of
Functionalism, mental causation, and the problem of metaphysically necessary effects
The recent literature on mental causation has not been kind to nonreductive, materialist functionalism ('functionalism', hereafter, except where that term is otherwise qualified). The exclusion
Physicalism, pluralism and causal completeness : on the metaphysical foundations for philosophy of mind
The so-called Exclusion argument (Kim 2000; Papineau 2004) about mental causation applies one premise that is typically accepted without much discussion: the thesis of causal completeness of the
The paper analyzes the relation between the mind body problem and the problem of free will within the physicalist framework. It is argued that the problem of free wifl, as far as metaphysics is
On Kim's critique of non-reductive physicalism
Kim criticizes non-reductive physicalism as a suitable metaphysics of mind among things because of its failure on the issue of mental causation. The failure is especially present in the thesis of
Physicalism, Mind, and the Ontology of Properties
In this thesis, I will try to find out how we can accommodate human mind in a physical world. What is significant in my attempt is that I try to approach this problem with a prospect that the theory
Do MacDonald and MacDonald Solve the Problem of Mental Causal Relevance?
Ever since Davidson first articulated and defended anomalous monism, nonreductive physicalists have struggled with the problem of mental causation. Considerations about the causal closure of the