Mill's Puzzling Footnote

@article{Dancy2000MillsPF,
  title={Mill's Puzzling Footnote},
  author={Jonathan Dancy},
  journal={Utilitas},
  year={2000},
  volume={12},
  pages={219 - 222}
}
  • J. Dancy
  • Published 1 July 2000
  • Philosophy
  • Utilitas
This paper discusses various possible interpretations of a complex footnote in Mill's Utilitarianism. 
An Introduction to Mill's Utilitarian Ethics
Introduction 1. Mill's life and philosophical background 2. Mill's criticism of alternative theories 3. Qualities of pleasure 4. Was Mill an act- or rule-utilitarian? 5. Sanctions and moral
Mill's Intentions and Motives
One might have thought that any right-thinking utilitarian would hold that motives and intentions are morally on a par, as either might influence the consequences of one's actions. However, in a
An Introduction to Mill's Utilitarian Ethics: Mill's Life and Philosophical Background
U tilitarianism as a distinct tradition in ethical thought was founded by Jeremy Bentham (1748–1832). The principle of utility, that the production of happiness and elimination of unhappiness should
A Critique of the Right Intention Condition as an Element of Jus ad Bellum
ABSTRACT According to just war theory, a resort to war is justified only if it satisfies the right intention condition. This article offers a critical examination of this condition, defending the
An Introduction to Mill's Utilitarian Ethics: Utility and Justice
I n Chapter 5 of Utilitarianism , entitled “On the Connection between Justice and Utility,” Mill acknowledges that one of the strongest objections to utilitarianism as a complete account of ethics is
The Moral Irrelevance of Constitutive Luck
One’s constitution—whether one is generous or miserly, temperate or intemperate, kind or mean, etc.—is beyond one’s control in significant respects. Yet one’s constitution affects how one acts. And
An Introduction to Mill's Utilitarian Ethics: Was Mill an Act- or Rule-Utilitarian?
I n the twentieth century a distinction has been made between forms of utilitarianism in which the rightness or wrongness of actions is a matter of the consequences of each particular action, case by
...
1
2
...