• Corpus ID: 40249434

Midterm Wave Elections: The Effects of Candidate Quality and Ideology on Reelection *

@inproceedings{Simpson2011MidtermWE,
  title={Midterm Wave Elections: The Effects of Candidate Quality and Ideology on Reelection *},
  author={Jonathan Simpson},
  year={2011}
}
The causes of seat change in midterm elections have been debated for decades. Some political scientists believe seat change is caused by heightened national conditions; others argue seat change is a result of conditions within districts. Political scientists agree however that candidate quality affects election outcomes. In general, the party that recruits the highest quality candidates and runs them in the most strategic districts will win the most seats. As this study reveals, when national… 

Tables from this paper

Nationalize or Localize: Senatorial Incumbent and Challenger Differences in Issue Prioritization

How do politicians choose which issues to emphasize in an election? Studying campaign behavior is crucial to understanding how political ads target voters and prioritize issues. Senate candidates

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 22 REFERENCES

Party, Performance, and Strategic Politicians: The Dynamics of Elections for Senator and Governor in 2006

In this article, we analyze a unique set of state-level monthly survey data covering the eighteen months preceding the 2006 election to estimate (1) the relative effects of national and local

The Importance of Candidate Characteristics and Local Political Conditions in the 1994 US Mid-Term Elections

An electoral earthquake hit the American political landscape in 1994. For the ®rst time since 1954, the Republican Party won control of the House of Representatives ending the longest uninterrupted

Strategic Politicians and the Dynamics of U.S. House Elections, 1946–86

Analysis of both district-level and aggregate time-series data from postwar House elections supports the thesis that strategic political elites play a pivotal role in translating national conditions

The 1994 House Elections in Perspective

The 1994 elections set off a political earthquake that will send aftershocks rumbling through national politics for years to come. For the first time in forty-two years, Republicans captured the

Explaining Challenger Quality in Congressional Elections

This study seeks to explain why some incumbents attract politically experienced, well-financed challengers while others do not. Using data from contested House races in 1980, we analyze the effects

Incumbent Vulnerability and Challenger Entry in Statewide Elections

Prior studies of challenger entry in Senate and gubernatorial elections provide inconclusive evidence that challengers consider incumbents' electoral vulnerability when deciding whether to run. The

The Presidential Pulse and the 1994 Midterm Congressional Election

The president's party lost more seats in 1994 than in any midterm election since 1946 The revised theory of surge and decline, which had successfully explained midterm losses since 1868, expected

Economic Conditions, Presidential Popularity, and Voting Behavior in Midterm Congressional Elections

Using data gathered in the CPS 1974, 1978, and 1982 American National Election Studies, this paper examines the effects of economic conditions and presidential popularity on voting in midterm

Preempting Quality Challengers in House Elections

Why do strong challengers oppose incumbents in some House districts and not in others? This paper compares the influence of several different strategic considerations which attract or dissuade good

Incumbent Popularity, Challenger Invisibility, and Congressional Voters

Congressional election scholars present two distinct explanations for the resounding electoral success of House incumbents-the popularity of the incumbents themselves and the invisibility of their