Meta-analytic interval estimation for bivariate correlations.

@article{Bonett2008MetaanalyticIE,
  title={Meta-analytic interval estimation for bivariate correlations.},
  author={Douglas G. Bonett},
  journal={Psychological methods},
  year={2008},
  volume={13 3},
  pages={
          173-81
        }
}
  • D. Bonett
  • Published 1 September 2008
  • Mathematics, Medicine
  • Psychological methods
The currently available meta-analytic methods for correlations have restrictive assumptions. The fixed-effects methods assume equal population correlations and exhibit poor performance under correlation heterogeneity. The random-effects methods do not assume correlation homogeneity but are based on an equally unrealistic assumption that the selected studies are a random sample from a well-defined superpopulation of study populations. The random-effects methods can accommodate correlation… Expand
Meta-analytic interval estimation for standardized and unstandardized mean differences.
  • D. Bonett
  • Mathematics, Medicine
  • Psychological methods
  • 2009
TLDR
New FE meta-analytic confidence intervals are proposed that are easy to compute and perform properly under effect-size heterogeneity and nonrandomly selected studies and may be used to combine unstandardized or standardized mean differences from studies having either independent samples or dependent samples. Expand
Varying coefficient meta-analytic methods for alpha reliability.
  • D. Bonett
  • Mathematics, Medicine
  • Psychological methods
  • 2010
TLDR
A new confidence interval for the average reliability coefficient of a specific measurement scale is based on a varying coefficient statistical model and is shown to perform well under realistic conditions of reliability heterogeneity and nonrandom sampling of studies. Expand
Confidence intervals for the between-study variance in random effects meta-analysis using generalised Cochran heterogeneity statistics.
  • D. Jackson
  • Medicine, Mathematics
  • Research synthesis methods
  • 2013
TLDR
Less efficient, but easily computed and exact, methods are developed to compute exact confidence intervals for the between-study variance using generalised versions of Cochran's heterogeneity statistic. Expand
Meta-analysis methods for risk differences.
  • D. Bonett, R. Price
  • Mathematics, Medicine
  • The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology
  • 2014
TLDR
Confidence interval methods based on a varying coefficient model are proposed for combining and comparing risk differences from multi-study between- subjects or within-subjects designs and are shown to have excellent finite-sample performance characteristics under realistic conditions. Expand
Varying coefficient meta-analysis methods for odds ratios and risk ratios.
TLDR
The results of extensive simulation studies suggest that the proposed varying coefficient methods have excellent performance characteristics under realistic conditions and should provide useful alternatives to the currently used meta-analysis methods. Expand
Transforming the Model T: random effects meta-analysis with stable weights.
TLDR
It is shown that one can better estimate parameters of fixed or random effects models with confidence intervals using stable weights or with profile approximate likelihood intervals following stabilization following stabilization and a simple t-interval provides very good coverage of an overall effect size without estimation of the inter-study variance. Expand
Synthesizer 1.0: A varying-coefficient meta-analytic tool
  • Z. Križan
  • Computer Science, Medicine
  • Behavior research methods
  • 2010
TLDR
A free statistical software tool that employs a varying-coefficient model recently proposed by Bonett (2008, 2009) that may be used to meta-analyze correlations, alpha reliabilities, and standardized mean differences. Expand
A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis.
TLDR
This paper explains the key assumptions of each model, and outlines the differences between the models, to conclude with a discussion of factors to consider when choosing between the two models. Expand
Statistical models for meta-analysis: A brief tutorial.
TLDR
This paper provides a brief introduction to meta-analysis, including a description of aggregate and individual participant dataMeta-analysis and describes recently proposed alternative models for conducting aggregate data meta- analysis, including the varying coefficient model. Expand
Bayesian meta-analysis of coefficient alpha.
TLDR
A Bayesian approach to the meta-analysis of coefficient alpha is described and illustrated by the analysis of studies of the reliability of the General Ethnicity Questionnaire - Abridged, a measure of identification with the culture of one's heritage and the culture in one's host country. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 31 REFERENCES
Confidence intervals for the amount of heterogeneity in meta-analysis.
TLDR
A novel method for constructing confidence intervals for the amount of heterogeneity in the effect sizes is proposed that guarantees nominal coverage probabilities even in small samples when model assumptions are satisfied and yields the most accurate coverage probabilities under conditions more analogous to practice. Expand
Is the meta-analysis of correlation coefficients accurate when population correlations vary?
  • A. Field
  • Mathematics, Medicine
  • Psychological methods
  • 2005
TLDR
A Monte Carlo study compared the efficacy of Hedges and Vevea's random-effects methods of meta-analysis with Hunter and Schmidt's, over a wide range of conditions, as the variability in population correlations increases. Expand
Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis.
There are 2 families of statistical procedures in meta-analysis: fixed- and randomeffects procedures. They were developed for somewhat different inference goals: making inferences about the effectExpand
Fixed Effects vs. Random Effects Meta‐Analysis Models: Implications for Cumulative Research Knowledge
Research conclusions in the social sciences are increasingly based on meta-analysis, making questions of the accuracy of meta-analysis critical to the integrity of the base of cumulative knowledge.Expand
Toward using confidence intervals to compare correlations.
  • G. Zou
  • Mathematics, Medicine
  • Psychological methods
  • 2007
TLDR
The distinctive feature of this approach is its acknowledgment of the asymmetry of sampling distributions for single correlations, which requires only the availability of confidence limits for the separate correlations and a method for taking into account the dependency between correlations. Expand
Unbiased Estimation of Certain Correlation Coefficients
1. Summary and introduction. This paper deals with the unbiased estimation of the correlation of two variates having a bivariate normal distribution (Sec. 2), and of the intraclass correlation, i.e.,Expand
Sample size requirements for estimating pearson, kendall and spearman correlations
Interval estimates of the Pearson, Kendall tau-a and Spearman correlations are reviewed and an improved standard error for the Spearman correlation is proposed. The sample size required to yield aExpand
Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research1
M y subject is data analysis at three levels. Primary analysis is the original analysis of data in a research study. It is what one typically imagines as the application of statistical methods.Expand
The fallacy of the null-hypothesis significance test.
TLDR
To the experimental scientist, statistical inference is a research instrument, a processing device by which unwieldy masses of raw data may be refined into a product more suitable for assimilation into the corpus of science, and in this lies both strength and weakness. Expand
IV.—On Least Squares and Linear Combination of Observations
In a series of papers W. F. Sheppard (1912, 1914) has considered the approximate representation of equidistant, equally weighted, and uncorrelated observations under the following assumptions:– (i)Expand
...
1
2
3
4
...