Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: the truth about false belief.

@article{Wellman2001MetaanalysisOT,
  title={Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: the truth about false belief.},
  author={Henry M. Wellman and David R. Cross and Julanne Watson},
  journal={Child development},
  year={2001},
  volume={72 3},
  pages={
          655-84
        }
}
Research on theory of mind increasingly encompasses apparently contradictory findings. In particular, in initial studies, older preschoolers consistently passed false-belief tasks-a so-called "definitive" test of mental-state understanding-whereas younger children systematically erred. More recent studies, however, have found evidence of false-belief understanding in 3-year-olds or have demonstrated conditions that improve children's performance. A meta-analysis was conducted (N = 178 separate… 

Infants' performance in spontaneous-response false belief tasks: A review and meta-analysis.

The Path to Fully Representational Theory of Mind: Conceptual, Executive, and Pragmatic Challenges

Results suggest that a fully representational ToM, one that is stable in the context of increased conceptual, executive, and pragmatic demands, may develop later than traditional accounts have assumed.

Theory of mind, executive function, and lying in children: a meta-analysis.

A comprehensive meta-analysis provides a clear picture of the associations between children's ToM/EF and their lying behavior and confirms that ToM and EF indeed play a positive role in children's lying and its development.

The Weird World of Cross-Cultural False-Belief Research: A True- and False-Belief Study Among Samoan Children Based on Commands

Previous cross-cultural research using false-belief tasks has explored whether children's theory of mind develops synchronously across cultures. Success on false-belief tasks is usually interpreted

Probing the depth of infants' theory of mind: disunity in performance across paradigms.

The nature of infants' performance in tasks designed to assess implicit theory of mind (ToM) understanding is clarified by adopting a within-subject design that involved testing 18-month-old infants on two batteries of tasks measuring the same four ToM constructs (intention, desire, true belief, and false belief).

Children’s Acquisition of the Concept of Belief and the Mastery of Folk Psychology

Until recently, most researchers assumed — based on evidence from the (elicitedanswer) false belief test (EA-FBT) — that children acquire the concept of belief around age four (Wellman, Cross, &

Language and theory of mind: meta-analysis of the relation between language ability and false-belief understanding.

A meta-analysis determines the strength of the relation in children under age 7 and examines moderators that may account for the variability across studies--including aspect of language ability assessed, type of false-belief task used, and direction of effect.

Children's understanding of second-order mental states.

Research directed to second-order false belief and other forms of higher order, recursive mentalistic reasoning are reviewed, revealing positive relations with a number of other aspects of children's development.
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 134 REFERENCES

Preschoolers' grasp of a desire for knowledge in false‐belief prediction: Practical intelligence and verbal report

Preschoolers often fail a false-belief test. Competing explanations have been offered from two perspectives: the theory of mind and the theory of reasons for action. A concept which unifies the two

On the Distinction between False Belief Understanding and Subscribing to an Interpretive Theory of Mind

2 groups of 5-8-year-olds were examined in an effort to explore the developing relations between false belief understanding and an awareness of the individualized nature of personal taste, on the one

Theory of mind and rule-based reasoning

Test-retest reliability for false-belief tasks.

Results corroborated previous findings of a developmental trend in the understanding of false-belief questions but, despite a general improvement in children's comprehension of the stories, the test-retest reliability for the false belief questions was poor.

Against the Cartesian view on mind: Young children's difficulty with own false beliefs

The present study was concerned with children's ability to identify a prior expectation of their own as false belief. In Expt 1 a sharp improvement was found between 3 years and 5 years not only in

The effect of humour on children's developing theory of mind

The understanding of false belief in 3–5-year-old children was investigated using a false-belief situation involving humour and characters playfully interacting with one another. The situation also

Children's Understanding of Preexisting Differences in Knowledge and Belief

Abstract A basic developmental task for children is to understand how people may differ in what they know and believe. Some such differences stem from situationally provided contrasts in immediate

Explaining young children's difficulty on the false belief task : representational deficits or context-sensitive knowledge ?

This study compared two explanations for the poor performance of 3-year-olds on the false belief task: an inability to represent false beliefs and context-sensitive problem solving schemas.
...