Memory for Fact, Fiction, and Misinformation

@article{Lewandowsky2005MemoryFF,
  title={Memory for Fact, Fiction, and Misinformation},
  author={Stephan Lewandowsky and Werner G. K. Stritzke and Klaus Oberauer and Michael Morales},
  journal={Psychological Science},
  year={2005},
  volume={16},
  pages={190 - 195}
}
Media coverage of the 2003 Iraq War frequently contained corrections and retractions of earlier information. For example, claims that Iraqi forces executed coalition prisoners of war after they surrendered were retracted the day after the claims were made. Similarly, tentative initial reports about the discovery of weapons of mass destruction were all later disconfirmed. We investigated the effects of these retractions and disconfirmations on people's memory for and beliefs about war-related… Expand

Figures, Tables, and Topics from this paper

Running head: ATTITUDES AND MISINFORMATION
Misinformation—defined as information that is initially assumed to be valid but is later corrected or retracted—often has an ongoing effect on people’s memory and reasoning. We tested the hypothesesExpand
Political Attitudes and the Processing of Misinformation Corrections
Misinformation often continues to influence people’s memory and inferential reasoning after it has been retracted; this is known as the continued influence effect (CIE). Previous researchExpand
Conquering the minds, conquering Iraq: The social production of misinformation in the United States – a case study
In the lead-up to the Iraq War, the Bush administration rallied the American public for war via claims that they held unassailable evidence that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction and throughExpand
Corrections of political misinformation: no evidence for an effect of partisan worldview in a US convenience sample
TLDR
Examining a sample of 429 pre-screened US participants supporting either the Democratic or Republican Party found no impact of political worldview on retraction effectiveness, let alone evidence of a backfire effect, and thus the present study did not replicate the asymmetry observed in the Australian-based study. Expand
Do people keep believing because they want to? Preexisting attitudes and the continued influence of misinformation
TLDR
The results showed that preexisting attitudes influence people’s use of attitude-related information but not the way in which a retraction of that information is processed. Expand
Processing political misinformation: comprehending the Trump phenomenon
TLDR
Findings suggest that people use political figures as a heuristic to guide evaluation of what is true or false, yet do not necessarily insist on veracity as a prerequisite for supporting political candidates. Expand
Terrorists brought down the plane!—No, actually it was a technical fault: Processing corrections of emotive information
TLDR
The impact of emotionality of the material on people's ability to discount corrected misinformation was investigated, with a focus on moderate levels of emotionability comparable to those elicited by real-world news reports. Expand
Misinformation, disinformation, and violent conflict: from Iraq and the "War on Terror" to future threats to peace.
TLDR
The way in which misinformation can facilitate violent conflicts and, conversely, how the successful refutation of misinformation can contribute to peace is reviewed. Expand
Attributional biases and the inability to ignore retracted information
The purpose of the study was to explore factors that result in one type of distortion in memory. In particular, previous research has shown that people have a difficult time disregarding causalExpand
Polarity and attitude effects in the continued-influence paradigm
Abstract Misinformation – information that is false or inaccurate – can continue to influence people’s memory and reasoning even after it has been corrected. Researchers have termed this theExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 11 REFERENCES
The continued influence of misinformation in memory: What makes a correction effective?
Publisher Summary This chapter discusses the influence of misinformation in memory. In a dynamic world, information in memory is frequently outdated, corrected, or replaced. People often make use ofExpand
Coerced Confessions and the Jury: An Experimental Test of the “Harmless Error” Rule
Prompted by the U.S. Supreme Court's landmark decision in Arizona v. Fulminante (1991), two studies evaluated the proposition that an erroneously admitted coerced confession can be consideredExpand
Can the Jury Disregard that Information? The Use of Suspicion to Reduce the Prejudicial Effects of Pretrial Publicity and Inadmissible Testimony
Mock jurors learned incriminating information about a defendant in the context of pretrial publicity (Study 1) or testimony introduced in the trial but ruled inadmissible (Study 2). Despite theExpand
Sources of the continued influence effect: When misinformation in memory affects later inferences.
Several lines of research have found that information previously encoded into memory can influence inferences and judgments, even when more recent information discredits it. Previous theories haveExpand
Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists.
False memories—either remembering events that never happened, or remembering them quite differently from the way they happened—have recently captured the attention of both psychologists and theExpand
On Certain Limitations Accompanying Readers’ Interpretations of Corrections in Episodic Text
Where information concerning an ongoing event is acquired piecemeal over time, it may become necessary to correct a particular item of information after it is first encountered. Previous workExpand
MEMORY ILLUSIONS
Memory illusions may be defined as cases in which a rememberer’s report of a past event seriously deviates from the event’s actual occurrence. This article introduces the special issue of the JournalExpand
Updating accounts following a correction of misinformation.
  • H. M. Johnson, C. Seifert
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
  • 1998
TLDR
The research examined whether corrected misinformation influences anaphoric inferences people make during subsequent reading and suggested that corrected misinformation can continue to influence on-line reading processes. Expand
Comprehending news articles: Updating the news
TLDR
The data suggest that participants update a previously constructed knowledge structure only when they take an active role in acquiring information. Expand
Assessing Extreme and Acquiescence Response Sets in Cross-Cultural Research Using Structural Equations Modeling
Extreme response styles (ERS) and acquiescence response styles (ARS) may constitute important sources of cross-cultural differences on survey-type instruments. Differences in ERS and ARS, ifExpand
...
1
2
...