Memory for Fact, Fiction, and Misinformation

@article{Lewandowsky2005MemoryFF,
  title={Memory for Fact, Fiction, and Misinformation},
  author={Stephan Lewandowsky and Werner G. K. Stritzke and Klaus Oberauer and Michael Morales},
  journal={Psychological Science},
  year={2005},
  volume={16},
  pages={190 - 195}
}
Media coverage of the 2003 Iraq War frequently contained corrections and retractions of earlier information. For example, claims that Iraqi forces executed coalition prisoners of war after they surrendered were retracted the day after the claims were made. Similarly, tentative initial reports about the discovery of weapons of mass destruction were all later disconfirmed. We investigated the effects of these retractions and disconfirmations on people's memory for and beliefs about war-related… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Political Attitudes and the Processing of Misinformation Corrections

Misinformation often continues to influence people’s memory and inferential reasoning after it has been retracted; this is known as the continued influence effect (CIE). Previous research

Running head: ATTITUDES AND MISINFORMATION

Misinformation—defined as information that is initially assumed to be valid but is later corrected or retracted—often has an ongoing effect on people’s memory and reasoning. We tested the hypotheses

Conquering the minds, conquering Iraq: The social production of misinformation in the United States – a case study

In the lead-up to the Iraq War, the Bush administration rallied the American public for war via claims that they held unassailable evidence that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction and through

Corrections of political misinformation: no evidence for an effect of partisan worldview in a US convenience sample

Examining a sample of 429 pre-screened US participants supporting either the Democratic or Republican Party found no impact of political worldview on retraction effectiveness, let alone evidence of a backfire effect, and thus the present study did not replicate the asymmetry observed in the Australian-based study.

Do people keep believing because they want to? Preexisting attitudes and the continued influence of misinformation

The results showed that preexisting attitudes influence people’s use of attitude-related information but not the way in which a retraction of that information is processed.

Processing political misinformation: comprehending the Trump phenomenon

Findings suggest that people use political figures as a heuristic to guide evaluation of what is true or false, yet do not necessarily insist on veracity as a prerequisite for supporting political candidates.

Terrorists brought down the plane!—No, actually it was a technical fault: Processing corrections of emotive information

The impact of emotionality of the material on people's ability to discount corrected misinformation was investigated, with a focus on moderate levels of emotionability comparable to those elicited by real-world news reports.

Misinformation, disinformation, and violent conflict: from Iraq and the "War on Terror" to future threats to peace.

The way in which misinformation can facilitate violent conflicts and, conversely, how the successful refutation of misinformation can contribute to peace is reviewed.

Attributional biases and the inability to ignore retracted information

The purpose of the study was to explore factors that result in one type of distortion in memory. In particular, previous research has shown that people have a difficult time disregarding causal
...

References

SHOWING 1-9 OF 9 REFERENCES

Coerced Confessions and the Jury: An Experimental Test of the “Harmless Error” Rule

Prompted by the U.S. Supreme Court's landmark decision in Arizona v. Fulminante (1991), two studies evaluated the proposition that an erroneously admitted coerced confession can be considered

Can the Jury Disregard that Information? The Use of Suspicion to Reduce the Prejudicial Effects of Pretrial Publicity and Inadmissible Testimony

Mock jurors learned incriminating information about a defendant in the context of pretrial publicity (Study 1) or testimony introduced in the trial but ruled inadmissible (Study 2). Despite the

Sources of the continued influence effect: When misinformation in memory affects later inferences.

Several lines of research have found that information previously encoded into memory can influence inferences and judgments, even when more recent information discredits it. Previous theories have

Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists.

False memories—either remembering events that never happened, or remembering them quite differently from the way they happened—have recently captured the attention of both psychologists and the

On Certain Limitations Accompanying Readers’ Interpretations of Corrections in Episodic Text

Where information concerning an ongoing event is acquired piecemeal over time, it may become necessary to correct a particular item of information after it is first encountered. Previous work

Updating accounts following a correction of misinformation.

The research examined whether corrected misinformation influences anaphoric inferences people make during subsequent reading and suggested that corrected misinformation can continue to influence on-line reading processes.

Comprehending news articles: Updating the news

Assessing Extreme and Acquiescence Response Sets in Cross-Cultural Research Using Structural Equations Modeling

Extreme response styles (ERS) and acquiescence response styles (ARS) may constitute important sources of cross-cultural differences on survey-type instruments. Differences in ERS and ARS, if