Memory Distortions Develop Over Time: Recollections of the O.J. Simpson Trial Verdict After 15 and 32 Months

@article{Schmolck2000MemoryDD,
  title={Memory Distortions Develop Over Time: Recollections of the O.J. Simpson Trial Verdict After 15 and 32 Months},
  author={Heike Schmolck and Elizabeth A. Buffalo and Larry R. Squire},
  journal={Psychological Science},
  year={2000},
  volume={11},
  pages={39 - 45}
}
Fifteen or 32 months after the verdict was announced in the O.J. Simpson murder trial, we asked college students about how they had heard the news, and we compared their responses with what they had told us 3 days after the verdict. Our study is the first to have assessed recollective accuracy at two different intervals more than 1 year after a noted public event. The quality of the recollections after 32 months was strikingly different from the quality of the recollections after 15 months… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Confounding the Effects of Delay and Interference on Memory Distortion: Commentary on Schmolck, Buffalo, and Squire
  • D. Horn
  • Psychology
    Psychological science
  • 2001
TLDR
Memory distortions in college students’ recollections of how they heard the verdict in the O.J. Simpson murder trial are investigated, finding that memories approximately 1 year after the event tend to be accurate, whereas those reported after a 3-year delay are more likely to be distorted.
Planting misinformation in the human mind: a 30-year investigation of the malleability of memory.
TLDR
This review of the field ends with a brief discussion of the newer work involving misinformation that has explored the processes by which people come to believe falsely that they experienced rich complex events that never, in fact, occurred.
The nature of recollection across months and years and after medial temporal lobe damage
TLDR
It is suggested that the MTL is especially important for accessing global information about events and the relationships among their elements.
Flashbulb memory for 11 September 2001
SUMMARY The recollection of particularly salient, surprising or consequential events is often called ‘flashbulb memories’. We tested people’s autobiographical memory for details of 11 September 2001
False Memories: What the Hell are They For?
Recollecting the past is often accompanied by a sense of veracity—a subjective feeling that we are reencountering fragments of an episode as it occurred. Yet years of research suggest that we can be
Hearing the news of the death of Princess Diana and September 11: How special are flashbulb memories?
Some events produce vivid and detailed memories lasting for many years whereas others are less detailed and easily forgotten. What makes some events more memorable than others? What is the role of
A ten-year follow-up of a study of memory for the attack of September 11, 2001: Flashbulb memories and memories for flashbulb events.
TLDR
The study examines retention of flashbulb memories and event memories at a substantially longer retention interval than any previous study using a test-retest methodology, allowing for the study of such memories over the long term.
Memory and Autobiographical Memory for the Events of September 11 , 2001
This research compares event memory and autobiographical memory for an event that was experienced to be more distressing, with more significant and widespread consequences than was any other event
Personal memories for remote historical events: accuracy and clarity of flashbulb memories related to World War II.
One hundred forty-five Danes between 72 and 89 years of age were asked for their memories of their reception of the news of the Danish occupation (April 1940) and liberation (May 1945) and for their
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 29 REFERENCES
The formation of flashbulb memories
TLDR
A causal analysis of secondary variables showed that the formation of FB memories was primarily associated with the level of importance attached to the event and level of affective response to the news.
Relating age at encoding in early childhood to adult recall: Development of flashbulb memories.
Three hundred thirty-eight informants who were between 1 and 7 years of age in 1963 were asked about their personal memories surrounding the assassination of President Kennedy and six other
Flashbulb memories of the assassination attempt on President Reagan
Flashbulb memories: Special, but not so special
TLDR
It was concluded that the loss of information during one year contradicts the notion that flashbulb memories persist in absolute accuracy over time, as has been claimed in previous studies.
Affect and Accuracy in Recall. Studies of « flashbulb » memories
Preface List of contributors 1. Introduction Eugene Winograd Part I. Empirical Studies: 2. Phantom flashbulbs: false recollections of hearing the news about Challenger Ulric Neisser and Nicole Harsch
Flashbulb memories for the space shuttle disaster: A tale of two theories
Source monitoring and memory distortion.
  • M. Johnson
  • Psychology
    Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences
  • 1997
TLDR
Experimental and clinical evidence regarding cognitive mechanisms and underlying brain structures of source monitoring are discussed and memory distortion reflects failures to identify the sources of mental experience.
Cognitive operations and decision bias in reality monitoring
In each of the three experiments, a reality monitoring task required subjects to discriminate between words they generated and words presented by an experimenter. Each of the experiments included a
Do you need a flash' to form a flashbulb memory?
On January 16, 1991, students encoded an «ordinary event» as part of a demonstration on flashbulb memories and completed a questionnaire modeled after Christianson (1989). By coincidence, the bombing
Phantom flashbulbs: False recollections of hearing the news about Challenger.
When I first heard about the explosion I was sitting in my freshman dorm room with my roommate and we were watching TV. It came on a news flash and we were both totally shocked. I was really upset
...
1
2
3
...