Mechanical versus bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement.

@article{Head2017MechanicalVB,
  title={Mechanical versus bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement.},
  author={Stuart J. Head and Mevl{\"u}t Çelik and Arie Pieter Kappetein},
  journal={European heart journal},
  year={2017},
  volume={38 28},
  pages={2183-2191}
}
Mechanical valves used for aortic valve replacement (AVR) continue to be associated with bleeding risks because of anticoagulation therapy, while bioprosthetic valves are at risk of structural valve deterioration requiring reoperation. This risk/benefit ratio of mechanical and bioprosthetic valves has led American and European guidelines on valvular heart disease to be consistent in recommending the use of mechanical prostheses in patients younger than 60 years of age. Despite these… CONTINUE READING
Recent Discussions
This paper has been referenced on Twitter 12 times over the past 90 days. VIEW TWEETS
4 Citations
124 References
Similar Papers

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 124 references

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…