Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling

@article{John2012MeasuringTP,
  title={Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling},
  author={L. John and G. Loewenstein and D. Prelec},
  journal={Psychological Science},
  year={2012},
  volume={23},
  pages={524 - 532}
}
Cases of clear scientific misconduct have received significant media attention recently, but less flagrantly questionable research practices may be more prevalent and, ultimately, more damaging to the academic enterprise. Using an anonymous elicitation format supplemented by incentives for honest reporting, we surveyed over 2,000 psychologists about their involvement in questionable research practices. The impact of truth-telling incentives on self-admissions of questionable research practices… Expand

Figures and Tables from this paper

What Crisis? Management Researchers’ Experiences with and Views of Scholarly Misconduct
Ethical Consistency and Experience: An Attempt to Influence Researcher Attitudes Toward Questionable Research Practices Through Reading Prompts
Research Practices That Can Prevent an Inflation of False-Positive Rates
  • K. Murayama, R. Pekrun, K. Fiedler
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc
  • 2014
Scientific misbehavior in economics
Playing with Data—Or How to Discourage Questionable Research Practices and Stimulate Researchers to Do Things Right
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 52 REFERENCES
A survey of newly appointed consultants' attitudes towards research fraud
  • D. Geggie
  • Medicine
  • Journal of medical ethics
  • 2001
Sensitive questions in surveys.
How Prevalent Is Fraud? That's a Million-Dollar Question
The Economics of Scientific Misconduct
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Scientists behaving badly
...
1
2
3
4
5
...