Measuring mumbo jumbo: A preliminary quantification of the use of jargon in science communication

@article{Sharon2014MeasuringMJ,
  title={Measuring mumbo jumbo: A preliminary quantification of the use of jargon in science communication},
  author={A. J. Sharon and A. Baram-Tsabari},
  journal={Public Understanding of Science},
  year={2014},
  volume={23},
  pages={528 - 546}
}
Leaders of the scientific community encourage scientists to learn effective science communication, including honing the skill to discuss science with little professional jargon. However, avoiding jargon is not trivial for scientists for several reasons, and this demands special attention in teaching and evaluation. Despite this, no standard measurement for the use of scientific jargon in speech has been developed to date. Here a standard yardstick for the use of scientific jargon in spoken… Expand

Figures, Tables, and Topics from this paper

Paper Mentions

Automatic jargon identifier for scientists engaging with the public and science communication educators
TLDR
The development and validation of the data produced by an up-to-date, scientist-friendly program for identifying jargon in popular written texts, based on a corpus of over 90 million words published in the BBC site during the years 2012–2015 are presented. Expand
Quantifying scientific jargon
TLDR
An R script is written that an author can use to quantify the amount of scientific jargon in any written piece and make appropriate edits based on the target audience. Expand
Annotated Primary Literature: A Professional Development Opportunity in Science Communication for Graduate Students and Postdocs
TLDR
A science communication professional development opportunity in which scientists at the graduate-level and above annotate primary scientific literature, effectively translating complex research into an accessible educational tool for undergraduate students is described. Expand
Jargon use in Public Understanding of Science papers over three decades
TLDR
An analysis of the readability and jargon in articles published in Public Understanding of Science throughout its almost three decades of existence to examine trends in accessibility to diverse audiences found that Public understanding of Science has moved away from everyday language. Expand
An instrument for assessing the public communication of scientists
An instrument for valid, quantitative assessment of scientists’ public communication promises to promote improved science communication by giving formative feedback to scientists developing theirExpand
The Effects of Jargon on Processing Fluency, Self-Perceptions, and Scientific Engagement
In this experiment (N = 650), we integrate ideas from the literatures on metacognition and self-perception to explain why the use of jargon negatively affects engagement with science topics. We offerExpand
Introducing Students to the Challenges of Communicating Science by Using a Tool That Employs Only the 1,000 Most Commonly Used Words †
  • Justin A. Pruneski
  • Medicine, Computer Science
  • Journal of microbiology & biology education
  • 2018
TLDR
This short classroom activity takes advantage of a free, web-based tool, called Simple Writer, which facilitates the writing and revising of text using only the 1,000 most commonly used words in English, to engage students in learning science and developing essential writing skills. Expand
Preparing Scientists to Be Science Communicators
Science communication is a professional skill increasingly expected of scientists by their own organizations. Several studies have described motivations and challenges for scientists who wish toExpand
From Apes to Whistleblowers
Scientists are being called upon to communicate more clearly, strategically, and frequently with the public. An understudied, but influential, outreach method is writing newspaper op-ed commentaries.Expand
The Effects of User Comments on Science News Engagement
Online sources such as social media have become increasingly important for the proliferation of science news, and past research has shown that reading user-generated comments after an article (i.e.Expand
...
1
2
3
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 69 REFERENCES
Distinctive words in academic writing: a comparison of three statistical tests for keyword extraction
TLDR
The log-likelihood ratio, the t-test and the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test are used in turn to compare the academic and the fiction sub-corpora of the British National Corpus and extract words that are typical of academic discourse. Expand
Scientists are talking, but mostly to each other: a quantitative analysis of research represented in mass media
Journal publication has long been relied on as the only required communication of results, tasking journalists with bringing news of scientific discoveries to the public. Output of science papersExpand
Do They Know What They Read? Building a Scientific Literacy Measurement Instrument Based on Science Media Coverage
The authors tested a novel approach to the conceptualization and measurement of a dimension of scientific literacy, the understanding of scientific and technical terms. Through an analysis of theExpand
An Instrument for Assessing Scientists’ Written Skills in Public Communication of Science
TLDR
The first tool for measuring scientists’ written skills in public communication of science is described, including the rationale for establishing learning goals in seven areas: clarity and language, content, knowledge organization, style, analogy, narrative, and dialogue. Expand
Explaining research: how to reach key audiences to advance your work
writing of articles and proposals, the principles given comprise a solid reference for any scientific text writing (reviews, papers, theses, reports ...) as well as presentations. Based on my ownExpand
Science Communication: A Contemporary Definition
Science communication is a growing area of practice and research. During the past two decades, the number of activities, courses, and practitioners has steadily increased. But what actually isExpand
A pilot science-specific word list
TLDR
This pilot study found 318 word families with coverage of approximately 4% over a science-specific corpus of 1.5 million running words, in contrast to its coverage of well under 1% of the arts, commerce, and law corpora mentioned above. Expand
A FORMULA FOR PREDICTING READABILITY
EVERAL months ago the editor of the Wall Street Journal ran a full-page advertisement in one of the leading literary magazines, announcing two honors recently awarded to it. One of these honors was aExpand
Am I making myself clear?: A scientist’s guide to talking to the public
TLDR
Though there is little new in Cornelia Dean’s book, she provides a thorough compilation of standard advice about science journalism, adding in the legal and policy contexts, and her suggestions are thoughtful and useful. Expand
What's next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions.
TLDR
Research from the social sciences on how the public makes sense of and participates in societal decisions about science and technology is reviewed, offering a set of detailed recommendations for improved public engagement efforts on the part of scientists and their organizations. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...