Measuring health: A guide to rating scales and questionnaires, 3rd ed.

  title={Measuring health: A guide to rating scales and questionnaires, 3rd ed.},
  author={Ian McDowell},
This is a convenient guide to the health measurement methods used in health and social surveys, epidemiological studies, and clinical trials. It describes the theory and the leading methods of measurement, all of which rely on subjective judgments in questionnaires and rating scales. The authors discuss the validity and reliability of each method, showing readers how to select the most suitable one, apply it, and score the results. Epidemiologists and health care researchers; social scientists… Expand
Assessment Measures and Clinical Scales
Increasingly, clinical trials in neurology are using standardised scales and assessment measures to determine the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions. To justify this important role inExpand
Functional Status Assessment in Relation to Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine
There is now an understanding that health involves more than the absence of disease and that measuring health includes a much wider spectrum of considerations than morbidity alone. This is reflectedExpand
Well-being measurement and the WHO health policy Health 2010: systematic review of measurement scales.
The contents of self-reported well-being measurement scales for use with individuals more than 15 years of age are identified to help researchers and politicians choose appropriate measurement tools. Expand
Methodology for measuring health-state preferences--II: Scaling methods.
Six scaling methods are described and evaluated on the basis of their reliability, validity, and feasibility, including the standard gamble, time trade-off, rating scale, magnitude estimation, equivalence, and willingness-to-pay methods. Expand
Health Status Measurement
In principle, metric measurement is not limited to physical, objective quantities, and relations. It can extend to magnitudes of any kind, including (partially) subjective phenomena such as health.Expand
Subjective and Objective Measures of Health: Which is Better When?
  • P. Cleary
  • Medicine
  • Journal of health services research & policy
  • 1997
A model of health status variables that includes both objective and subjective characteristics of individuals is described and measurement considerations associated with different types of variables are discussed. Expand
Health Measurement Development and Interpretation
Outcome measures help clinicians assess the risks and benefits of treatment in relation to a multi-faceted definition of health. While surrogate outcomes, including performance-based tests, provideExpand
Why are we weighting? A critical examination of the use of item weights in a health status measure.
This paper addresses a number of related issues concerning the weights attached to particular items on this questionnaire and argues that the weighting of items by Thurstone's method of paired comparisons is inappropriate and can lead to logically inconsistent results. Expand
Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research.
  • E. Andresen
  • Medicine
  • Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation
  • 2000
Traditional criteria are recommended, including psychometric properties of validity, reliability, and sensitivity to change, as are newer statistical methods for assessing scaling properties, such as Rasch analysis. Expand
Convergent validity of two measures of the quality of life.
A test of convergent validity is undertaken for two methods of quality of life assessment, one based on a shortened version of the Health Measurement Questionnaire and the other based on professional clinical judgement, which yield outcomes broadly consistent with criteria. Expand