Measuring depression with CES-D in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes: the validity and its comparison to PHQ-9

@inproceedings{Zhang2015MeasuringDW,
  title={Measuring depression with CES-D in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes: the validity and its comparison to PHQ-9},
  author={Yuying Zhang and Rose Z.W. Ting and Marco Ho-bun Lam and S W Lam and Roseanne O. Yeung and Hairong Nan and Risa Ozaki and Andrea O. Y. Luk and Alice P S Kong and Yun Kwok Wing and Norman Sartorius and Juliana C. N. Chan},
  booktitle={BMC psychiatry},
  year={2015}
}
BACKGROUND The validity of the 20-item Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression (CES-D) scale for depression screening in Hong Kong Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes remains unknown. We aimed to validate CES-D, compare its psychometric properties with the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and explore whether one of the two is more suitable for depression screening in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS Between June 2010 and July 2011, 545 consecutive Chinese… CONTINUE READING
Related Discussions
This paper has been referenced on Twitter 1 time. VIEW TWEETS

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 37 references

validation of the center for epidemiologic studies Zhang et al

D Stahl, CF Sum, +4 authors symptoms et al. Screening for depressive
BMC Psychiatry • 2015
View 5 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure.

Journal of general internal medicine • 2001
View 3 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

Optimal cut-off score for diagnosing depression with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9): a meta-analysis.

CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne • 2012

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…