Measuring Moral Rhetoric in Text

@article{Sagi2013MeasuringMR,
  title={Measuring Moral Rhetoric in Text},
  author={Eyal Sagi and Morteza Dehghani},
  journal={Social Science Computer Review},
  year={2013},
  volume={32},
  pages={132 - 144}
}
In this paper we present a computational text analysis technique for measuring the moral loading of concepts as they are used in a corpus. This method is especially useful for the study of online corpora as it allows for the rapid analysis of moral rhetoric in texts such as blogs and tweets as events unfold. We use latent semantic analysis to compute the semantic similarity between concepts and moral keywords taken from the “Moral foundation Dictionary”. This measure of semantic similarity… 

Figures from this paper

Moral Foundations Twitter Corpus: A Collection of 35k Tweets Annotated for Moral Sentiment

The Moral Foundations Twitter Corpus is introduced, a collection of 35,108 tweets that have been curated from seven distinct domains of discourse and hand annotated by at least three trained annotators for 10 categories of moral sentiment.

The Morality Machine: Tracking Moral Values in Tweets

This paper introduces The Morality Machine, a system that tracks ethical sentiment in Twitter discussions based on Moral Foundations Theory, a framework of moral values that are assumed to be universal.

Do Bots Have Moral Judgement? The Difference Between Bots and Humans in Moral Rhetoric

This work analyzes the evolution of latent moral loadings over time and across different sub-narratives on human and bot-generated tweets from April 1st, 2018 to April 30th, 2019 to present the significant differences between the strength and patterns of moral rhetoric for human andBot-generated content on Twitter.

Quantifying Latent Moral Foundations in Twitter Narratives: The Case of the Syrian White Helmets Misinformation

It is argued that gaining more in-depth insight into moral dimensions coupled with sentiment analysis can potentially provide superior results, as the concept of morality provides additional information on the unobservable characteristics of information processing and non-conscious cognitive processes.

The Moral Foundations in New York Times

Finding moral words and distinguishing the kinds of moral reasoning used in a text is an underdeveloped area of research with many potential applications. The present study attempts to apply Jonathan

Incorporating the Measurement of Moral Foundations Theory into Analyzing Stances on Controversial Topics

The correlation analysis of stance and morality revealed notable associations between stances on social issues and various types of morality, such as care, fairness, and loyalty, hence demonstrating that there are certain morality types that are more attributed to stance classification than others.

Enhancing the Measurement of Social Effects by Capturing Morality

This work empirically evaluates the usage of a morality lexicon that was expanded via a quality controlled, human in the loop process and finds that the enhancement of the original lexicon led to measurable improvements in prediction accuracy for the selected NLP tasks.

Development of the Japanese Moral Foundations Dictionary: Procedures and Applications

The Japanese version of the MFD is developed by introducing a semi-automated method and it is found that English users are more likely to talk about immorality-related topics online than Japanese users and that English and Japanese users emphasize different moral categories.

The extended Moral Foundations Dictionary (eMFD): Development and applications of a crowd-sourced approach to extracting moral intuitions from text

The extended Moral Foundations Dictionary (eMFD) is introduced, a dictionary-based tool for extracting moral content from textual corpora that outperforms existing approaches in a variety of domains and is constructed from text annotations generated by a large sample of human coders.

The Moral Foundations Reddit Corpus

The Moral foundations Reddit Corpus is presented, a collection of 16,123 English Reddit comments that have been curated from 12 distinct subreddits, hand-annotated by at least three trained annotators for 8 categories of moral sentiment based on the updated Moral Foundations Theory (MFT) framework.
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 41 REFERENCES

Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think

In this classic text, the first full-scale application of cognitive science to politics, George Lakoff analyzes the unconscious and rhetorical worldviews of liberals and conservatives, discovering

How Words Do the Work of Politics: Moral Foundations Theory and the Debate over Stem Cell Research

Moral considerations underlie partisan and ideological identification along with a variety of political attitudes, yet we know little about how elites strategically appeal to the public’s moral

Moral Foundations Theory: The Pragmatic Validity of Moral Pluralism

Automatic Word Sense Discrimination

This paper presents context-group discrimination, a disambiguation algorithm based on clustering that demonstrates good performance of context- group discrimination for a sample of natural and artificial ambiguous words.

A Solution to Plato's Problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis Theory of Acquisition, Induction, and Representation of Knowledge.

A new general theory of acquired similarity and knowledge representation, latent semantic analysis (LSA), is presented and used to successfully simulate such learning and several other psycholinguistic phenomena.

Above and Below Left–Right: Ideological Narratives and Moral Foundations

Why do people vary in their views of human nature and their visions of the good society? Why do many people categorize themselves as “liberal,” “conservative,” “libertarian,” “socialist,” and so on?

Ambiguity in language learning: computational and cognitive models

It is shown here that--contrary to much skepticism in contemporary linguistic theories--analogy, induction, distribution and association are powerful sources of information and can, in concert with general cognitive innateknowledge, but without language-specific innate knowledge, learn important properties of language that are thought to be innate by many.

Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations.

Across 4 studies using multiple methods, liberals consistently showed greater endorsement and use of the Harm/care and Fairness/reciprocity foundations compared to the other 3 foundations, whereas conservatives endorsed and used the 5 foundations more equally.

Classifying Party Affiliation from Political Speech

It is found that party classifiers trained on 2005 House speeches can be generalized to the Senate speeches of the same year, but not vice versa, which indicates the classifiers' time-dependency.