Measuring Fairness in Ranked Outputs

@article{Yang2017MeasuringFI,
  title={Measuring Fairness in Ranked Outputs},
  author={Ke Yang and Julia Stoyanovich},
  journal={Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Scientific and Statistical Database Management},
  year={2017}
}
  • Ke Yang, Julia Stoyanovich
  • Published 2017
  • Computer Science
  • Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Scientific and Statistical Database Management
Ranking and scoring are ubiquitous. We consider the setting in which an institution, called a ranker, evaluates a set of individuals based on demographic, behavioral or other characteristics. The final output is a ranking that represents the relative quality of the individuals. While automatic and therefore seemingly objective, rankers can, and often do, discriminate against individuals and systematically disadvantage members of protected groups. This warrants a careful study of the fairness of… Expand
Maximizing Marginal Fairness for Dynamic Learning to Rank
Designing Fair Ranking Schemes
A Nutritional Label for Rankings
FARE: Diagnostics for Fair Ranking using Pairwise Error Metrics
Rank aggregation algorithms for fair consensus
Fairness of Exposure in Rankings
Policy Learning for Fairness in Ranking
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-3 OF 3 REFERENCES
CSRankings: Computer science rankings, 2016
  • 2016
Machine bias
  • ProPublica, May 23
  • 2016
2013
  • UCI Machine Learning Repository.
  • 2013