Measurement of optic disc size: equivalence of methods to correct for ocular magnification.

@article{GarwayHeath1998MeasurementOO,
  title={Measurement of optic disc size: equivalence of methods to correct for ocular magnification.},
  author={David F. Garway-Heath and Alicja R. Rudnicka and Tom Lowe and Paul J Foster and Fred W. Fitzke and Roger Hitchings},
  journal={The British journal of ophthalmology},
  year={1998},
  volume={82 6},
  pages={643-9}
}
AIMS To compare methods available to correct the magnification of images that result from the optics of the eye and identify errors, and source of error, of the methods. METHODS 11 methods were applied to ocular biometry data from three independent cohorts. Each method was compared with the method of Bennett, which uses most biometric data. The difference between each method and Bennett's is the "error" of the method. The relation between the error and axial length, ametropia, and keratometry… CONTINUE READING
56 Citations
38 References
Similar Papers

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 56 extracted citations

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 38 references

An appraisal of the accuracy of Littmann ’ s method of determining the real dimension of a retinal object

  • DB Barr
  • Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl
  • 1995

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…