McCloskey and me: a back-and-forth.

Abstract

McCloskey and Conway should have gotten their story straight. In a review of Bailey’s (2003) book, McCloskey (2003) wrote: ‘‘Almost everyone in the scientific study of sex and gender has checked and balanced and resisted the Clarke Institute’s theory. It has proven to be wrong and has been laid aside by the mainstream of gender researchers.’’ The review… (More)
DOI: 10.1007/s10508-008-9344-y

Figures and Tables

Sorry, we couldn't extract any figures or tables for this paper.