Marx and Science

  title={Marx and Science},
  author={Paul Thomas},
  journal={Political Studies},
  pages={1 - 23}
  • P. Thomas
  • Published 1 March 1976
  • Sociology
  • Political Studies
ly, for itself, separated from man, is nothing for man’. Men, by their very nature, or more properly by their very humanity, apply themselves to the world. The interaction of human, sensuous activity and objectified nature is a process in which man’s labour produces the external world facing him. The world apprehended by the senses is in this sense the counterpart of the human being himself. ‘Nature, as it unfolds in human history, in the genesis of human society, is man’s real nature; hence… Expand
Marx and Human Nature
This chapter reviews one of Geras’s most important contributions to the study of Marx, his account of Marx’s view of human nature. Geras provides a relatively thin account of human nature, which heExpand
Unity and Development
This article examines the relationship between the classical Marxist tradition and the conceptual roots of totalitarianism. Here totalitarianism is understood to entail the attempt to frame theExpand
Marx's Laws
Marx was a party to 19th-century debates about what he called the ‘historical social sciences' and their laws. But he was more forthright in rejecting positivism and empiricism than he was inExpand
Engels Without Dogmatism
Both friends and critics of Marxism standardly subscribe to what might be characterized as the Andy Pandy theory of the relationship between Marx and Engels. I refer here to a children’s programme,Expand
Alienation in the Older Marx
Where alienation is concerned, the older Marx has something to puzzle everyone. There are far too many uses of terminology related to the concept of alienation for those who assert the existence of aExpand
On the Alleged Differences between Marx and Engels
The supposed differences between Marx and Engels hinge on Marx's failure to endorse Anti-Dühring, on his refusal to hypostatize dialectical categories independent of human reflection and on hisExpand
Marx, Engels and Dialectics
Two familiar ‘facts' about Marx, Engels and their views are in reality fictions. The first is that Marx and Engels speak with the same voice on all important theoretical issues; that their worksExpand
H. M. Hyndman, E. B. Bax, and the Reception of Karl Marx’s Thought in Late-Nineteenth Century Britain, c. 1881-1893
This thesis examines how the idea of Socialism was remade in Britain during the 1880s. It does so with reference to the two figures most receptive to the work of Karl Marx, H. M. Hyndman and E. B.Expand
Assumptions of the Dialectical Method
Marx employed a wide array of analytical tools and strategies. However, how the elements of his approach across its range are related to one another was left rather undeveloped by him and Engel'sExpand
The Marx-Darwin Question: Implications for the Critical Aspects of Marx's Social Theory
This article deals with the implications of recently revived analogies between Marx and Darwin for the critical aspects of Marx's thought. Good prima facie reasons exist to be suspicious of suchExpand


Marx refers to this passage in his 'Marginal Notes' on