Maps of Bounded Rationality : a Perspective on Intuitive Judgment and Choice

@inproceedings{2003MapsOB,
  title={Maps of Bounded Rationality : a Perspective on Intuitive Judgment and Choice},
  author={},
  year={2003}
}
  • Published 2003
The work cited by the Nobel committee was done jointly with the late Amos Tversky (1937–1996) during a long and unusually close collaboration. Together, we explored the psychology of intuitive beliefs and choices and examined their bounded rationality. This essay presents a current perspective on the three major topics of our joint work: heuristics of judgment, risky choice, and framing effects. In all three domains we studied intuitions – thoughts and preferences that come to mind quickly and… CONTINUE READING
Highly Influential
This paper has highly influenced 23 other papers. REVIEW HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL CITATIONS

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 144 extracted citations

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 119 references

Extensional vs. intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment

A. Tversky, D. Kahneman
Psychological Review, • 1983
View 6 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk

E C O N OMETRICA
1979
View 6 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

A psychological point of view: Violations of rational rules as a diagnostic of mental processes (Commentary on Stanovich and West)

D. Kahneman
Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 681–683. • 2000
View 6 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

Evaluation by Moments : Past and Future

View 6 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

Sources of power: How people make decisions

G. Klein
Cambridge: MIT Press. • 1998
View 3 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

Why existence value should be used in cost-benefit analysis

R. Kopp
Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 11, 123–130. • 1992
View 4 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…