Many researchers say they'll share data - but don't.

@article{Watson2022ManyRS,
  title={Many researchers say they'll share data - but don't.},
  author={Clare S Watson},
  journal={Nature},
  year={2022}
}
1 Citations

A guide to open science practices for animal research

Translational biomedical research relies on animal experiments and provides the underlying proof of practice for clinical trials, which places an increased duty of care on translational researchers

References

SHOWING 1-6 OF 6 REFERENCES

The landscape of COVID‐19 trials in Australia

The landscape of COVID-19 trials in Australia is explored, and to what extent Australian researchers have responded to global need for coordination and collaboration, to explore the number and size of trials, funding, trial purpose, study design, data sharing plans, and collection of core outcomes.

Data sharing—trialists' plans at registration, attitudes, barriers and facilitators: A cohort study and cross‐sectional survey

There is a gap between high in‐principle support for data sharing, and low in‐practice intention from investigators to share data from their own clinical trials, and multiple pathways exist to bridge this gap by addressing the identified barriers to data sharing.

COVID-19 trials: declarations of data sharing intentions at trial registration and at publication

Intent to share individual participant-level data from COVID-19 interventional trials is limited at a time of pressing need for researchers to work together to combat a global pandemic.

Evaluation of Data Sharing After Implementation of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors Data Sharing Statement Requirement

There is a wide gap between declared and actual sharing of clinical trial data, and among the 89 articles declaring that individual-participant data would be stored in secure repositories, data from only 17 articles were found in the respective repositories as of April 10, 2020.