SHOWING 1-6 OF 6 REFERENCES
Many researchers were not compliant with their published data sharing statement: mixed-methods study.
- Medicine, PsychologyJournal of clinical epidemiology
COVID-19 interventional trials: Analysis of data sharing intentions during a time of pandemic
- MedicineContemporary Clinical Trials
The landscape of COVID‐19 trials in Australia
- Medicine, Political ScienceThe Medical journal of Australia
The landscape of COVID-19 trials in Australia is explored, and to what extent Australian researchers have responded to global need for coordination and collaboration, to explore the number and size of trials, funding, trial purpose, study design, data sharing plans, and collection of core outcomes.
Data sharing—trialists' plans at registration, attitudes, barriers and facilitators: A cohort study and cross‐sectional survey
- Medicine, PsychologyResearch synthesis methods
There is a gap between high in‐principle support for data sharing, and low in‐practice intention from investigators to share data from their own clinical trials, and multiple pathways exist to bridge this gap by addressing the identified barriers to data sharing.
COVID-19 trials: declarations of data sharing intentions at trial registration and at publication
- Medicine, PsychologyTrials
Intent to share individual participant-level data from COVID-19 interventional trials is limited at a time of pressing need for researchers to work together to combat a global pandemic.
Evaluation of Data Sharing After Implementation of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors Data Sharing Statement Requirement
- MedicineJAMA network open
There is a wide gap between declared and actual sharing of clinical trial data, and among the 89 articles declaring that individual-participant data would be stored in secure repositories, data from only 17 articles were found in the respective repositories as of April 10, 2020.