Many Labs 5: Registered Replication of Vohs and Schooler (2008), Experiment 1

@article{Buttrick2020ManyL5,
  title={Many Labs 5: Registered Replication of Vohs and Schooler (2008), Experiment 1},
  author={Nicholas R. Buttrick and Balazs Aczel and Lena Fanya Aeschbach and Bence Bakos and Florian Br{\"u}hlmann and Heather M. Claypool and Joachim H{\"u}ffmeier and M{\'a}rton Kov{\'a}cs and Kurt Schuepfer and P{\'e}ter Sz{\'e}csi and Attila Szuts and Orsolya Sz{\"o}ke and Manuela Thomae and Ann-Kathrin Torka and Ryan J. Walker and Michael J. Wood},
  journal={Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science},
  year={2020},
  volume={3},
  pages={429 - 438}
}
Does convincing people that free will is an illusion reduce their sense of personal responsibility? Vohs and Schooler (2008) found that participants reading from a passage “debunking” free will cheated more on experimental tasks than did those reading from a control passage, an effect mediated by decreased belief in free will. However, this finding was not replicated by Embley, Johnson, and Giner-Sorolla (2015), who found that reading arguments against free will had no effect on cheating in… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Many Labs 5: Testing Pre-Data-Collection Peer Review as an Intervention to Increase Replicability

TLDR
Analysis of the cumulative evidence across the original studies and the corresponding three replication attempts provided very precise estimates of the 10 tested effects and indicated that their effect sizes were 78% smaller, on average, than the original effect sizes.

Manipulating Belief in Free Will and Its Downstream Consequences: A Meta-Analysis.

  • O. GenschowEmiel Cracco J. Schooler
  • Psychology, Philosophy
    Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc
  • 2022
Ever since some scientists and popular media put forward the idea that free will is an illusion, the question has risen what would happen if people stopped believing in free will. Psychological

Relating free will beliefs and attitudes

Most people believe in free will, which is foundational for our sense of agency and responsibility. Past research demonstrated that such beliefs are dynamic, and can be manipulated experimentally.

Idea Technology and Ideology

  • B. Schwartz
  • Philosophy
    Culture, medicine and psychiatry
  • 2021
TLDR
Nasa is discussed as the "next frontier" of ideology that may change the authors' conceptions of human nature and mechanisms by which it can have effects on both individuals and societies are suggested.

Human values and basic philosophical beliefs

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 36 REFERENCES

The Value of Believing in Free Will

TLDR
The study of whether inducing participants to believe that human behavior is predetermined would encourage cheating suggests that the debate over free will has societal, as well as scientific and theoretical, implications.

Free Will and Punishment: A Mechanistic View of Human Nature Reduces Retribution

TLDR
Results illustrate that exposure to debates about free will and to scientific research on the neural basis of behavior may have consequences for attributions of moral responsibility.

The FAD–Plus: Measuring Lay Beliefs Regarding Free Will and Related Constructs

We describe the development of FAD–Plus, a 27-item measure of lay beliefs in free will and 3 closely related constructs: scientific determinism, fatalistic determinism, and unpredictability.

Statistical power and optimal design in experiments in which samples of participants respond to samples of stimuli.

TLDR
It is shown that in crossed designs, statistical power typically does not approach unity as the number of participants goes to infinity but instead approaches a maximum attainable power value that is possibly small, depending on the stimulus sample.

The Double-Edged Sword: Does Biomechanism Increase or Decrease Judges' Sentencing of Psychopaths?

TLDR
This work tested whether expert testimony concerning a biomechanism of psychopathy increases or decreases punishment and contribute to the literature on how biological explanations of behavior figure into theories of culpability and punishment.

An Evaluation of Interrater Reliability Measures on Binary Tasks Using d-Prime

TLDR
In situations where two raters make a series of binary judgments, the findings suggest that researchers should choose Phi or Kappa to assess interrater agreement as the superiority of these indices was least influenced by variations in the decision environment and characteristics of the decision makers.

Dancing the Sample Size Limbo with Mixed Models: How Low Can You Go?

Whereas general sample size guidelines have been suggested when estimating multilevel models, they are only generalizable to a relatively limited number of data conditions and model structures, both

A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales

CONSIDER Table 1. It represents in its formal characteristics a situation which arises in the clinical-social-personality areas of psychology, where it frequently occurs that the only useful level of