Manuscript Quality before and after Peer Review and Editing at Annals of Internal Medicine

@article{Goodman1994ManuscriptQB,
  title={Manuscript Quality before and after Peer Review and Editing at Annals of Internal Medicine},
  author={S. Goodman and J. Berlin and S. Fletcher and R. Fletcher},
  journal={Annals of Internal Medicine},
  year={1994},
  volume={121},
  pages={11-21}
}
Publication of medical research has high stakes: the communication and legitimization of medical research, the advancement of authors' careers, priorities in funding decisions, the direction of future research, and the visibility and prestige of journals themselves. Peer review and editing play central roles in the publication process, affecting the acceptance of a manuscript and the form in which it appears. The most commonly heard justification of peer review is that it is an indispensable… Expand
The role of the manuscript reviewer in the peer review process.
  • J. Polak
  • Medicine
  • AJR. American journal of roentgenology
  • 1995
How to “Peer Review” a Medical Journal Manuscript
  • S. Salasche
  • Medicine
  • Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.]
  • 1997
Editorial: Peer Review and the Editorial Process – A Look Behind the Curtain
  • S. Leopold
  • Medicine
  • Clinical orthopaedics and related research
  • 2015
Effects of editorial peer review: a systematic review.
So you want to publish your research in the Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis?
  • M. Greaves
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH
  • 2017
Medical Journal Editing: Who Shall Pay?
  • H. Sox
  • Medicine
  • Annals of Internal Medicine
  • 2009
Shortcomings of peer review in biomedical journals
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 36 REFERENCES
The philosophical basis of peer review and the suppression of innovation.
Is a mechanism such as the NCI's Clinical Alert ever an appropriate alternative to journal peer review?
  • V. Devita
  • Medicine
  • Important advances in oncology
  • 1991
Guarding the guardians: a conference on editorial peer review.
How good is peer review?
A difficult balance: Editorial peer review in medicine
...
1
2
3
4
...