Manipulation Arguments and Libertarian Accounts of Free Will

  title={Manipulation Arguments and Libertarian Accounts of Free Will},
  author={Taylor W. Cyr},
  journal={Journal of the American Philosophical Association},
  pages={57 - 73}
  • Taylor W. Cyr
  • Published 2020
  • Economics
  • Journal of the American Philosophical Association
Abstract In response to the increasingly popular manipulation argument against compatibilism, some have argued that libertarian accounts of free will are vulnerable to parallel manipulation arguments, and thus manipulation is not uniquely problematic for compatibilists. The main aim of this article is to give this point a more detailed development than it has previously received. Prior attempts to make this point have targeted particular libertarian accounts but cannot be generalized. By… Expand
1 Citations
Manipulation and constitutive luck
I argue that considerations pertaining to constitutive luck undermine historicism—the view that an agent’s history can determine whether or not she is morally responsible. The main way thatExpand


Soft Libertarianism and Hard Compatibilism
In this paper I discuss two kinds of attempts to qualify incompatibilist and compatibilist conceptions of freedom to avoid what have been thought to be incredible commitments of these rival accounts.Expand
The Parallel Manipulation Argument*
Matt King has recently argued that the manipulation argument against compatibilism does not succeed by employing a dilemma: either the argument infelicitously relies on incompatibilist sourcehoodExpand
The Structure of a Manipulation Argument*
The most prominent recent attack on compatibilism about determinism and moral responsibility is the so-called manipulation argument, which presents an allegedly responsibility-underminingExpand
A new approach to manipulation arguments
There are several argumentative strategies for advancing the thesis that moral responsibility is incompatible with causal determinism. One prominent such strategy is to argue that agents who meetExpand
Defeating Manipulation Arguments: Interventionist causation and compatibilist sourcehood
We use recent interventionist theories of causation to develop a compatibilist account of causal sourcehood, which provides a response to Manipulation Arguments for the incompatibility of free willExpand
The Manipulation Argument, At the Very Least, Undermines Classical Compatibilism
The compatibility of determinism and the ability to do otherwise has been implicitly assumed by many to be irrelevant to the viability of compatibilist responses to the manipulation argument forExpand
The Zygote Argument is invalid: Now what?
Alfred Mele’s original Zygote Argument is invalid. At most, its premises entail the negative thesis that free action is incompossible with deterministic laws, but its conclusion asserts the positiveExpand
The Problem with Manipulation*
It is often charged that compatibilists have a problem with manipulation. There are certain cases in which victims of manipulation seem to be not responsible for what they do, despite meetingExpand
Libertarian Free Will and CNC Manipulation
An agent who is the victim of covert and nonconstraining control (CNC) is unaware of being controlled and controllers get their way by manipulating the victims so that they willingly do what theExpand
A hard-line reply to pereboom's four-case manipulation argument
Recently there has been a heightened interest in the free will debate about the soundness of the incompatibilist's Manipulation Argument. The argument has a respectable history. ImpressiveExpand