Manipulating Google Scholar Citations and Google Scholar Metrics: simple, easy and tempting
@article{LpezCzar2012ManipulatingGS, title={Manipulating Google Scholar Citations and Google Scholar Metrics: simple, easy and tempting}, author={Emilio Delgado L{\'o}pez-C{\'o}zar and Nicol{\'a}s Robinson-Garc{\'i}a and Daniel Torres-Salinas}, journal={ArXiv}, year={2012}, volume={abs/1212.0638} }
The launch of Google Scholar Citations and Google Scholar Metrics may provoke a revolution in the research evaluation field as it places within every researchers reach tools that allow bibliometric measuring. In order to alert the research community over how easily one can manipulate the data and bibliometric indicators offered by Google s products we present an experiment in which we manipulate the Google Citations profiles of a research group through the creation of false documents that cite…
87 Citations
The Google scholar experiment: How to index false papers and manipulate bibliometric indicators
- EducationJ. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol.
- 2014
The results of an experiment undertaken to analyze Google Scholar's capacity to detect citation‐counting manipulation are shown and it is discussed how the effects of such an outburst could affect the future development of such products, at both the individual level and the journal level.
Do authors play fair or manipulate Google Scholar h-index?
- EducationLibr. Hi Tech
- 2022
PurposeThe study's main purpose is to scrutinize Google Scholar profiles and find the answer to the question, “Do authors play fair or manipulate Google Scholar Bibliometric Indicators like h-index…
Language Bias in the Google Scholar Ranking Algorithm
- Computer ScienceFuture Internet
- 2021
A reverse engineering research methodology based on a statistical analysis that uses Spearman's correlation coefficient points to a bias in multilingual searches conducted in Google Scholar with documents published in languages other than in English being systematically relegated to positions that make them virtually invisible.
Microsoft academic search and Google scholar citations: Comparative analysis of author profiles
- Computer ScienceJ. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol.
- 2014
A comparative analysis of the personal profiling capabilities of the two most important free citation‐based academic search engines, namely, Microsoft Academic Search (MAS) and Google Scholar Citations (GSC) shows that the GSC profiles include more documents and citations than those in MAS but with a strong bias toward the information and computing sciences.
Google scholar citation in retrospect: Visibility and contributions of African scholars
- Education
- 2016
The study examines usability of Google Scholar Citation (GSC) by African Scholars, to determine e-visibility and productivity. Data of registered scholars in African institutions were obtained…
A Reflection on the Applicability of Google Scholar as a Tool for Comprehensive Retrieval in Bibliometric Research and Systematic Reviews
- Computer Science
- 2018
The present research intended to highlight the limitations brought about by efficiency policies of the search engine and its impact on the results available to users by examining the accessibility of the retrieval results of Google Scholar.
Ranking journals: could Google Scholar Metrics be an alternative to Journal Citation Reports and Scimago Journal Rank?
- Computer ScienceLearn. Publ.
- 2013
Despite its shortcomings, Google Scholar Metrics is a helpful tool for authors and editors in identifying core journals and as an increasingly useful tool for ranking scientific journals, it may also challenge established journals products.
Google Scholar Metrics: an unreliable tool for assessing scientific journals
- Computer Science
- 2012
It is concluded that, despite Google Scholar ’s value as a source for scientific assessment, GSM is an immature product with many shortcomings, and therefore it is advised against its use for evaluation purposes.
Cross-Examining Google Scholar
- Education
- 2013
An academic librarian and a public librarian debate the strengths, weaknesses, and idiosyncrasies of Google Scholar in this installment of "Taking Issues".
References
SHOWING 1-10 OF 22 REFERENCES
Is Google Scholar useful for bibliometrics? A webometric analysis
- Computer ScienceScientometrics
- 2011
A novel approach is introduced to check the usefulness of this database for bibliometric analysis, and especially research evaluation, instead of names of authors or institutions, a webometric analysis of academic web domains is performed.
Los repositorios en Google Scholar Metrics o ¿qué hace un tipo documental como tú en un lugar como ese?
- Computer Science
- 2012
New arguments against the inclusion of repositories in the journal rankings presented in Google Scholar Metrics are offered, along with empirical data warning against this contradictory situation, and a lack of bibliographic control there is in Google scholar Metrics is shown.
Google Scholar duped and deduped – the aura of “robometrics”
- Physics
- 2011
An analysis of how Google Scholar has been duped by real but manipulated documents and reference lists, as well as by fake documents and references is provided.
Detecting h-index manipulation through self-citation analysis
- EngineeringScientometrics
- 2010
The q-index is proposed as an indicator for how strategically an author has placed self-citations, and which serves as a tool to detect possible manipulation of the h-index.
The pros and cons of computing the h-index using Google Scholar
- Computer ScienceOnline Inf. Rev.
- 2008
The paper shows that effective corroboration of the h‐index and its two component indicators can be done only on persons and journals with which a researcher is intimately familiar, and shows that Corroborative tests must be done in every database for important research.
Users, narcissism and control – tracking the impact of scholarly publications in the 21st century
- Education
- 2012
This report explores the explosion of tracking tools that have accompanied the surge of web based information instruments. Is it possible to monitor ‘real-time’ how new research findings are being…
Who reviews the reviewers? Feasibility of using a fictitious manuscript to evaluate peer reviewer performance.
- MedicineAnnals of emergency medicine
- 1998
Confirmational Response Bias Among Social Work Journals
- Psychology
- 1980
This article reports the results of a study of confirmational response bias among social work journals. A contrived research paper with positive findings and its negative mirror image were submitted…
The number that's devouring science
- Education
- 2005
The Faculty Research & Books Government & Politics Money & Management Information Technology Students Athletics International Community Colleges Short Subjects Gazette Corrections Opinion & Forums…
Ike Antkare one of the great stars in the scientific firmament
- Art
- 2010
How Ike Antkare became one of the most highly cited scientists in the modern world and
how you could become like him.