Manipulating Decision Making of Typical Agents

@article{Yukalov2014ManipulatingDM,
  title={Manipulating Decision Making of Typical Agents},
  author={Vyacheslav I. Yukalov and Didier Sornette},
  journal={IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems},
  year={2014},
  volume={44},
  pages={1155-1168}
}
  • V. YukalovD. Sornette
  • Published 2 September 2014
  • Economics
  • IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems
We investigate how the choice of decision makers can be varied under the presence of risk and uncertainty. Our analysis is based on the approach we have previously applied to individual decision makers, which we now generalize to the case of decision makers that are members of a society. The approach employs the mathematical techniques that are common in quantum theory, justifying our naming as quantum decision theory. However, we do not assume that decision makers are quantum objects. The… 

Quantum Probabilities as Behavioral Probabilities

It is shown that quantum behavioral probabilities of humans do not merely explain qualitatively how human decisions are made, but they predict quantitative values of the behavioral probabilities.

Quantum-based Decision Making Under Uncertainty in the Presence of Entanglement for the Development of Optimal Strategies in Engineering Design

The work presented concerns the development of a quantum-based decision making model utilised in the identification of optimal strategies in engineering design under uncertainty in a quantum-like

Quantum Decision Theory in Simple Risky Choices

This article revisits the formalism of QDT along a concrete example and offers a practical guide to researchers who are interested in applying QDT to a dataset of binary lotteries in the domain of gains.

Horse-race between decision-making models Quantum Decision Theory and " Classical " counterparts

In this work, we propose another parametrization of Quantum Decision Theory (QDT), based on Rank Dependent Utility Theory (RDU). Using experimental data made of choices between pairs of lotteries, we

The Conjunction Fallacy in Quantum Decision Theory

A novel empirically motivated "QDT indeterminacy (or uncertainty) principle,'' is proposed, as a fundamental limit of the precision with which certain sets of prospects can be simultaneously known by a decision maker, or elicited by an experimental procedure.

Quantitative Predictions in Quantum Decision Theory

Quantum decision theory is generalized to the games containing lotteries with gains as well as losses, providing a method to quantitatively predict decision-maker choices, including the cases of games with high uncertainty for which the classical expected utility theory fails.

Inconclusive Quantum Measurements and Decisions under Uncertainty

We give a mathematical definition for the notion of inconclusive quantum measurements. In physics, such measurements occur at intermediate stages of a complex measurement procedure, with the final

Modeling social interactions and their effects on individual decision making

In this thesis, we are interested in the influence of social environment on individual decision making. We develop models of social interactions and culture, with the aim to facilitate their

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 94 REFERENCES

Quantum decision making by social agents

The influence of additional information on the decision making of agents, who are interacting members of a society, is analyzed within the mathematical framework based on the use of quantum

Decision theory with prospect interference and entanglement

It is demonstrated how the violation of the Savage’s sure-thing principle, known as the disjunction effect, can be explained quantitatively as a result of the interference of intentions, when making decisions under uncertainty.

The Disjunction Effect in Choice under Uncertainty

One of the basic axioms of the rational theory of decision under uncertainty is Savage's (1954) sure-thing principle (STP) It states that if prospect x is preferred to y knowing that Event A

THE AMBIGUITY AVERSION LITERATURE: A CRITICAL ASSESSMENT

We provide a critical assessment of the ambiguity aversion literature, which we characterize in terms of the view that Ellsberg choices are rational responses to ambiguity, to be explained by

Subjective Probability Weighting and the Discovered Preference Hypothesis

Numerous studies have convincingly shown that prospect theory can better describe risky choice behavior than the classical expected utility model because it makes the plausible assumption that risk

Physics of risk and uncertainty in quantum decision making

A general methodology based on self-similar approximation theory for deriving the evolution equations for the probabilities of future prospects provides a novel classification of possible discount factors, which include the previously known cases (exponential or hyperbolic discounting), but also predicts a novel class of discount factors that decay to a strictly positive constant for very large future time horizons.

Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk

Analysis of decision making under risk has been dominated by expected utility theory, which generally accounts for people's actions. Presents a critique of expected utility theory as a descriptive

Mathematical Structure of Quantum Decision Theory

It is demonstrated that all known anomalies and paradoxes, documented in the context of classical decision theory, are reducible to just a few mathematical archetypes, all of which allow the finding of straightforward explanations in the frame of the developed quantum approach.

NON-EXPECTED UTILITY THEORY

The expected utility/subjective probability model of risk preferences and beliefs has long been the preeminent model of individual choice under conditions of uncertainty. It exhibits a tremendous

Decision field theory: a dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment.

Decision field theory provides for a mathematical foundation leading to a dynamic, stochastic theory of decision behavior in an uncertain environment and is compared with 4 other theories of decision making under uncertainty.
...