Managers and leaders: are they different?

@article{Zaleznik2004ManagersAL,
  title={Managers and leaders: are they different?},
  author={Abraham Zaleznik},
  journal={Clinical leadership \& management review : the journal of CLMA},
  year={2004},
  volume={18 3},
  pages={
          171-7
        }
}
  • A. Zaleznik
  • Published 1 July 1981
  • Psychology, Medicine, Sociology
  • Clinical leadership & management review : the journal of CLMA
The traditional view of management, back in 1977 when Abraham Zaleznik wrote this article, centered on organizational structure and processes. Managerial development at the time focused exclusively on building competence, control, and the appropriate balance of power. That view, Zaleznik argued, omitted the essential leadership elements of inspiration, vision, and human passion which drive corporate success. The difference between managers and leaders, he wrote, lies in the conceptions they… 

Topics from this paper

Leadership and management: what’s the difference?
It’s more than 40 years since Abraham Zalenzick, in a now classic Harvard Business Review article, asked the question, Managers and Leaders. Are They Different? 1 His conclusion was that ‘yes’, they
Complexities of Organization Dynamics and Development: Leaders and Managers.
This article shows the theoretical framework for understanding organizational dynamics and development the change theory and subordinate relationships within contemporary organizations. The emphasis
ORGANIZATIONAL STASIS: THE UNDOING OF LEADERSHIP?
The “story” of leadership within organizations is one that emphasizes the extraordinary and not the mundane (Alvesson and Sveningsson, 2003). It is a “story” of shaping, influencing and challenging
Unleashed? Developing creativity-friendly leadership theory
All organisations, we are told these days, need more of two things: 1) strong leadership; 2) creativity. A closer look at influential leadership theories, however, quickly shows up their focus on
Rethinking managership, leadership, followership, and partnership
Abstract Organizations underperform, or fail, when members do not partner with managers (through subtle resistance, disagreement, protest, or walk-out) to achieve common purpose. A manager boosts
Good Visions, Bad Micro-management and Ugly Ambiguity: Contradictions of (Non-)Leadership in a Knowledge-Intensive Organization
This article investigates how managers position themselves and their work in terms of leadership in a large knowledge-intensive company. The significance of contemporary discourse on leadership,
The ambidextrous organization: integrating managers, entrepreneurs and leaders
Purpose – Argues that three basic archetypes – managers, entrepreneurs and leaders – must exist within the “ambidextrous organization” where a balance must be found between managing the present while
Management Versus Leadership: A Key Theoretical Distinction
Leaders and managers are not the same. Management and leadership have been used differently by researchers, scholars and practitioners, on one hand as synonymous terms, and, on the other, as two
Differentiating Leadership from Management: An Empirical Investigation of Leaders and Managers
There has been a long-standing debate in the literature as to why and how leadership is similar to, or different from, management. Although several scholars have contributed to the debate, there
Leadership Challenges in Academia
This thesis is an exploration of leadership dimensions of academic organisational processes. It consists of four case studies, each presenting a leadership challenge. These studies of specific
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-2 OF 2 REFERENCES
My years with General Motors
When Alfred P. Sloan, Jr. joined General Motors in 1918, it was a sprawling, loosely organized company heading toward severe financial and management crises. Two years later, after the resignation of
Jack Hanley Got There by Selling Harder
  • Fortune
  • 1976