Making sense of strategic clinical networks.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Maternity and children’s services are one of the four service areas for which Strategic Clinical Networks (SCN) have been designated in England. Is this latest introduction to the new commissioning framework good news or something that will hardly impinge on the working lives of most paediatricians? More importantly, will this impact on the health outcomes for babies, children and young people (CYP)? Certainly there is much room for improvement; across the UK there remains huge variation in both health and service quality for children. Furthermore, a review of health services across Western Europe has recorded that the UK has moved from the average to the worst for ‘all-cause’ mortality rate for children aged 0–14 years. There are many reasons for this statistic, but the authors concluded that some health systems are not keeping up with the changing health needs of children, and that a whole-system approach is required to improve outcomes. Consequently, if SCNs provide an opportunity to make the necessary cross-organisational changes to service, then it is beholden on paediatricians to engage.

DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-303976

Cite this paper

@article{Spencer2013MakingSO, title={Making sense of strategic clinical networks.}, author={Andy Spencer and Carol I Ewing and Steve Cropper}, journal={Archives of disease in childhood}, year={2013}, volume={98 11}, pages={843-5} }