Main trends in recent philosophy: two dogmas of empiricism.

@article{Quine1951MainTI,
  title={Main trends in recent philosophy: two dogmas of empiricism.},
  author={W. V. Quine},
  journal={The Philosophical Review},
  year={1951},
  volume={60},
  pages={20}
}
  • W. Quine
  • Published 1951
  • Philosophy
  • The Philosophical Review
M ODERN empiricism has been conditioned in large part by two dogmas. One is a belief in some fundamental cleavage between truths which are analytic, or grounded in meanings independently of matters of fact, and truth which are synthetic, or grounded in fact. The other dogma is reductionism: the belief that each meaningful statement is equivalent to some logical construct upon terms which refer to immediate experience. Both dogmas, I shall argue, are ill founded. One effect of abandoning them is… 

W. V. Quine’s “Two Dogmas of Empiricism”

True to the spirit of Topoi’s Untimely Reviews section, the present essay is a work of the counterfactual imagination. Suppose that Quine’s “Two Dogmas” had been written and published in the late

Why I am not an analytic philosopher

Abstract From a certain simplistic and inaccurate, although regrettably popular, perspective philosophy, at least for the past few decades, is available only in two main flavours - analytic and

The Logic in Philosophy of Science

Major figures of twentieth-century philosophy were enthralled by the revolution in formal logic, and many of their arguments are based on novel mathematical discoveries. Hilary Putnam claimed that

Analyticity

  • Gary Ebbs
  • Philosophy, Psychology
    A Theory of Truthmaking
  • 2019
This is what many philosophers believe today about the analytic/synthetic distinction: In his classic early writings on analyticity in particular, in “Truth by convention” “Two dogmas of empiricism”

The “Political” philosophy of logical empiricism

LOGICAL empiricists, of course, have no philosophy of politics beyond what they have suggested in footnotes and asides; and these say only that political questions which do not fit into the unity of

Just how controversial is evidential holism?

It is argued that the most oft-cited and controversial thesis in evidential holism is entirely unmotivated, and the other two theses are much overlooked, but are well-motivated and free from controversial implications.

Truth in Virtue of Meaning Reconsidered

Abstract The positivists defined analyticity as truth in virtue of meaning alone and advocated the view that the notion of analyticity so defined is co-extensive with both the notion of an a priori

A spectre is haunting history – the spectre of science

Alluding to the ghost of Communism which, according to the Communist Manifesto, hovered over Europe as both a threat and a much desired prospect, I contend in the paper that, in like manner, an ideal

Non-supernaturalism: Linguistic Convention, Metaphysical Claim, or Empirical Matter of Fact?

This paper examines our pre-theoretic conception of non-supernaturalism; the thesis that all that exists is natural. It is argued that we intuitively take this thesis to be a substantive,

Aesthetics and the Problem of Evil

: Much of Western speculative metaphysics has subscribed to what has been called “explanatory rationalism,” which holds that there is a reason for everything that is and for the way everything is.
...