Magnetic resonance arthrography versus arthroscopy in the evaluation of articular hip pathology.

@article{Keeney2004MagneticRA,
  title={Magnetic resonance arthrography versus arthroscopy in the evaluation of articular hip pathology.},
  author={James A. Keeney and Michael W Peelle and Jennifer Jackson and David Rubin and William J. Maloney and John C F Clohisy},
  journal={Clinical orthopaedics and related research},
  year={2004},
  volume={429},
  pages={163-9}
}
In this study, we compared magnetic resonance arthrography results with hip arthroscopy findings to assess the diagnostic value of this imaging technique in evaluating acetabular labral tears and concurrent articular hip pathology. One hundred one consecutive patients (102 hips) with a clinical diagnosis of acetabular labral tear were assessed using magnetic resonance arthrography and had hip arthroscopy after failing to improve with nonoperative treatment. Magnetic resonance arthrography… CONTINUE READING

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 83 extracted citations

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…