Machines and Mindlessness: Social Responses to Computers

@article{Nass2000MachinesAM,
  title={Machines and Mindlessness: Social Responses to Computers},
  author={Clifford Nass and Youngme Moon},
  journal={Journal of Social Issues},
  year={2000},
  volume={56},
  pages={81-103}
}
Following Langer (1992), this article reviews a series of experimental studiesthat demonstrate that individuals mindlessly apply social rules and expecta-tions to computers. The first set of studies illustrates how individuals overusehuman social categories, applying gender stereotypes to computers and ethnicallyidentifying with computer agents. The second set demonstrates that people exhibitoverlearned social behaviors such as politeness and reciprocity toward comput-ers.Inthethirdsetofstudies… 

Mindlessness and gaining compliance in Computer-Human Interaction

What Triggers Social Responses to Flattering Computers? Experimental Tests of Anthropomorphism and Mindlessness Explanations

Two explanations for the computers are social actors (CASA) paradigm are evaluated: anthropomorphism and mindlessness, which examine how humanlikeness of the interface, individuals’ rationality, and cognitive busyness moderate the extent to which people apply social attributes to computers.

Does Humanity Matter? Analyzing the Importance of Social Cues and Perceived Agency of a Computer System for the Emergence of Social Reactions during Human-Computer Interaction

Challenges in a 2 × 2 between subjects design with two levels of agency and two interfaces with different degrees of social cues show that participants in the virtual human condition reported a stronger sense ofmutual awareness, imputed more positive characteristics, and allocated more attention to thevirtual human than participants inthe text chat conditions.

Gender Stereotyping of Computers: Resource Depletion or Reduced Attention?

Two experiments extended the computers are social actors paradigm by examining when and why people are more likely to evince gender-typed responses to computers. In both experiments, participants

Social Categorization and Cooperation between Humans and Computers

It is demonstrated in Experiment 4 that the framework based on social categorization theory can predict situations where people will cooperate more with computers than with humans, and implications for understanding people’s decision making with human and non- human others.

CASA, WASA, and the dimensions of us

Children's Responding to Humanlike Agents Reflects an Uncanny Valley

It is found that, like adults, children were most averse to highly humanlike robots (relative to less human like robots and humans), but, unlike adults,Children's aversion did not translate to avoidance and indicates that the valley effect manifests well before adulthood.
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 64 REFERENCES

Machines, social attributions, and ethopoeia: performance assessments of computers subsequent to "self-" or "other-" evaluations

It is shown that individuals use inappropriate social rules in assessing machine behavior and individuals' responses to technology are shown to be inconsistent with their espoused beliefs.

The Mindlessness of Ostensibly Thoughtful Action: The Role of "Placebic" Information in Interpersonal Interaction

Three field experiments were conducted to test the hypothesis that complex social behavior that appears to be enacted mindfully instead may be performed without conscious attention to relevant

Charismatic computers: creating more likable and persuasive interactive technologies by leveraging principles from social psychology

Following the Computers Are Social Actors (CASA) paradigm, this dissertation investigated the claim that computers will be perceived as more likable and persuasive when they leverage principles and

Can computer personalities be human personalities?

The claim that computer personalities can be human personalities was tested by demonstrating that (1) computer personalities can be easily created using a minimal set of cues, and (2) that people

Are computers scapegoats? Attributions of responsibility in human-computer interaction

This study investigated how people make attributions of responsibility when interacting with computers and predicted similarity between a user's personality and a computer's personality would reduce the tendency for users to exhibit a “self-serving bias” in assigning responsibility for outcomes in human?computer interaction.

The second self: Computers and the human spirit

In The Second Self, Sherry Turkle looks at the computer not as a “tool,” but as part of our social and psychological lives; she looks beyond how we use computer games and spreadsheets to explore how

Mental Models : Towards a Cognitive Science of Language

Mental Models offers nothing less than a unified theory of the major properties of mind: comprehension, inference, and consciousness. In spirited and graceful prose, Johnson-Laird argues that we

Effects of Humor in Task-Oriented Human-Computer Interaction and Computer-Mediated Communication: A Direct Test of SRCT Theory

Results suggest both that humor may enhance likability of an interface and that SRCT theory should be revised, and implications for user-interface design and guidelines for the use of humor in HCI are discussed.

How mental systems believe.

Is there a difference between believing and merely understanding an idea?Descartes thought so. He considered the acceptance and rejection of an idea to be alternative outcomes of an effortful

Truth is beauty: researching embodied conversational agents

(1941) argues that the sole criterion for excellent research is that the researcher produces " beauty. " While seemingly ineffable and frustratingly imprecise, Hardy instead suggests that creating
...