MAVARIC - a comparison of automation-assisted and manual cervical screening: a randomised controlled trial.

@article{Kitchener2011MAVARICA,
  title={MAVARIC - a comparison of automation-assisted and manual cervical screening: a randomised controlled trial.},
  author={Henry C Kitchener and Roger Blanks and Heather A. Cubie and Mina Desai and Graham Dunn and Rosa Legood and Alastair Gray and Zia Sadique and Siobhan Moss},
  journal={Health technology assessment},
  year={2011},
  volume={15 3},
  pages={
          iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-170
        }
}
OBJECTIVES The principal objective was to compare automation-assisted reading of cervical cytology with manual reading using the histological end point of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade II (CIN2) or worse (CIN2+). Secondary objectives included (i) an assessment of the slide ranking facility of the Becton Dickinson (BD) FocalPoint™ Slide Profiler (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), especially 'No Further Review', (ii) a comparison of the two approved automated systems, the… CONTINUE READING

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 28 CITATIONS

Expenditure and resource utilisation for cervical screening in Australia

  • BMC Health Services Research
  • 2012
VIEW 16 EXCERPTS
CITES METHODS
HIGHLY INFLUENCED

Outcomes in cervical screening using various cytology technologies: what's age got to do with it?

  • European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation
  • 2013
VIEW 5 EXCERPTS
CITES RESULTS, METHODS & BACKGROUND
HIGHLY INFLUENCED

References

Publications referenced by this paper.

MAVARIC – a comparison of automation - assisted and manual cervical screening : a randomised controlled trial

HC Kitchener, R Blanks, +3 authors R Legood
  • Health Technol Assess
  • 2011