Lord Sumption and the values of life, liberty and security: before and since the COVID-19 outbreak

@article{Coggon2021LordSA,
  title={Lord Sumption and the values of life, liberty and security: before and since the COVID-19 outbreak},
  author={John Coggon},
  journal={Journal of Medical Ethics},
  year={2021},
  volume={48},
  pages={779 - 784}
}
  • J. Coggon
  • Published 12 July 2021
  • Law
  • Journal of Medical Ethics
Lord Sumption, a former Justice of the Supreme Court, has been a prominent critic of coronavirus restrictions regulations in the UK. Since the start of the pandemic, he has consistently questioned both the policy aims and the regulatory methods of the Westminster government. He has also challenged rationales that hold that all lives are of equal value. In this paper, I explore and question Lord Sumption’s views on morality, politics and law, querying the coherence of his broad philosophy and… 

Is it worth treating patients with COVID‐19 in intensive care? Utility, choice, costs and value

The cost of critical care for COVID-19 patients was worth it (with the possible exception of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation) because their estimated cost per quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) of £7511 is far below the thresholds conventionally set.

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 37 REFERENCES

Assisted dying challenges: Dynamic and stasis in the UK courts: Conway v. Secretary of State for Justice

This commentary reviews the High Court Decision in Conway v. Secretary of State for Justice. Mr Conway’s argument, that section 2(1) Suicide Act is incompatible with his right of respect for his

The wonder of euthanasia: a debate that’s being done to death

In their book Debating Euthanasia, Emily Jackson and John Keown present respectively arguments in favour of and against the legalization of (some instances of) euthanasia and assisted suicide.

The Law and Ethics of Medicine: Essays on the Inviolability of Human Life

PART I: (MIS)UNDERSTANDING THE INVIOLABILITY OF LIFE 1. The 'Sanctity of Life', 'Best Interests', and 'Autonomy': An Overview 2. Surveying the Foundations of Medical Law: A Reassessment of Glanville

Ignoring the moral and intellectual shape of the law after Bland: the unintended side-effect of a sorry compromise

In this paper, I explore the sanctity of life doctrine and consider the scope of s 4(5) of the Mental Capacity Act 2005, a provision designed to give statutory effect to the sanctity principle.

A threshold of significant harm (f)or a viable alternative therapeutic option?

This article critically examines the legal arguments presented on behalf of Charlie Gard’s parents based on a threshold test of significant harm for intervention into the decisions made jointly by holders of parental responsibility, and argues that the legal basis of the argument was tenuous.

‘My child, my choice’: parents, doctors and the ethical standards for resolving their disagreement

  • D. Archard
  • Psychology
    Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly
  • 2019
Disagreements between doctors and parents as to the appropriate treatment of a child have been exacerbated by a number of recent developments, especially the use of the internet. In normative terms

Legal, Moral and Political Determinants within the Social Determinants of Health: Approaching Transdisciplinary Challenges through Intradisciplinary Reflection

It is argued that the way that laws are grounded practically as part of a broader concept of politics and evaluated normatively for their instrumental value has important implications for the study of law itself.

Public Health Law: Ethics, Governance, and Regulation

This ground-breaking book presents the field of public health ethics and law and goes on to examine the impact within the UK of private law, criminal law, public law, EU and international law, and ‘softer’ regulatory approaches.

R (Nicklinson) v Ministry of Justice [2014] UKSC 38, Supreme Court

Essential Cases: Criminal Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. This case document summarizes the facts and decision in R (Nicklinson) v Ministry of Justice [2014]