Long-term results of revision total hip arthroplasty with improved cementing technique.

@article{Katz1997LongtermRO,
  title={Long-term results of revision total hip arthroplasty with improved cementing technique.},
  author={R P Katz and John J. Callaghan and Patrick M Sullivan and Richard C. Johnston},
  journal={The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume},
  year={1997},
  volume={79 2},
  pages={
          322-6
        }
}
We performed 83 consecutive cemented revision total hip arthroplasties in 77 patients between 1977 and 1983 using improved cementing techniques. One patient (two hips) was lost to follow-up. The remaining 76 patients (81 hips) had an average age at revision of 63.7 years (23 to 89). At the final follow-up 18 hips (22%) had had a reoperation, two (2.5%) for sepsis, three (4%) for dislocation and 13 (16%) for aseptic loosening. The incidence of rerevision for aseptic femoral loosening was 5.4… 
View on PubMed
boneandjoint.org.uk
94 Citations
Highly Influential Citations
1
Background Citations
21
Results Citations
4

94 Citations

Citation Type

Citation Type

Hybrid revision total hip arthroplasty: a 7-year follow-up study.
TLDR
HGP cementless acetabular components and precoated cemented femoral components inserted with so-called second generation femoral cementing technique in each case showed excellent results in revision surgery of failed nonseptic THAs.
Revision total hip arthroplasty using third-generation cementing technique.
TLDR
In this retrospective cohort study, femoral cement pressurization per se did not appear to improve the results over those of other studies using second-generation techniques.
Revision total hip arthroplasty using cemented collarless double-taper femoral components at a mean follow-up of 13 years (8 to 20): an update.
TLDR
Femoral revision using a cemented collarless double-taper stem, particularly with a long length stem, and in patients aged > 70 years, continues to yield excellent results up to 20 years post-operatively, including in hips with considerable femoral metaphyseal bone loss.
Short Term Results of Cementless Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty using an Interlocking Femoral Stem
TLDR
The short term results of revision total hip arthroplasty using an interlocking femoral stem (BiCONTACT) were satisfactory and no visible osteolysis was detected.
Clinical experience with a modular noncemented femoral component in revision total hip arthroplasty: 4- to 7-year results.
A series of 163 revision total hip arthroplasties performed using a modular proximally porous-coated device was reviewed. Twenty patients died before achieving minimum follow-up, and 13 hips with…
The use of cemented and cementless femoral components in revision total hip arthroplasty: a review of the literature
TLDR
The most reliable option in femoral revision is probably the extensively porouscoated femoral component, the re-revision rates for which ranged from 0 to 6% after an average follow-up of 4 to 13 years.
Augmentation of Acetabular Cement Fixation in Revision Hip Arthroplasty with Titanium Screws
TLDR
In this analysis 22 elderly patients with severe acetabular bone loss at the time of revision have been prospectively studied both clinically and radiologically at a mean follow-up of 4.8 years.
Use of constrained acetabular components for hip instability: an average 10-year follow-up study.
Cementless Two-staged Total Hip Arthroplasty for Deep Periprosthetic Infection
TLDR
The results of this study support the continued use of cementless implant fixation for two-staged reconstruction of the infected total hip arthroplasty and suggest that cementless femoral component fixation seemed to be more reliable and durable in comparison to previous reports of revision total hip ligation with cemented stems.
Radiological evaluation of the femoral component fixed with interface bioactive bone cement in revision total hip arthroplasty.
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 27 REFERENCES
Revision for aseptic stem loosening using the cemented Charnley prosthesis. A review of 351 hips.
TLDR
Good results both clinically and radiologically can be achieved by cemented revision of the femoral stem for aseptic loosening, and survivorship analysis gave 97.0% survival at eight years and 91.6% at 11 years.
Improved cementing techniques and femoral component loosening in young patients with hip arthroplasty. A 12-year radiographic review.
To assess the effect of improved methods of femoral cementing on the loosening rates in young patients, we reviewed 50 'second-generation' cemented hip arthroplasties in 44 patients aged 50 years or…
The effect of improved cementing techniques on component loosening in total hip replacement. An 11-year radiographic review.
TLDR
Improved cementing techniques have produced a marked reduction in the rate of aseptic loosening of the femoral component, but the incidence of acetabular loosening is unchanged.
Cemented total hip arthroplasty with contemporary techniques. A five-year minimum follow-up study.
TLDR
Results from this study of cemented THAs using contemporary techniques and prosthetic stem design represent the standard for comparison when evaluating alternative THA systems.
Long-term results of cemented femoral revision surgery using second-generation techniques. An average 11.7-year follow-up evaluation.
TLDR
From a group of 43 hips in 41 patients, in whom second-generation cementing techniques were used during femoral revision hip surgery, 38 hips in 36 patients were rereviewed at an average follow-up period of 11.7 years (range, 118-172 months).
The results of revision of total hip arthroplasty.
TLDR
The results of 140 total hip revision procedures for "non-septic" loosening, dislocation, and fracture of the femoral stem or shaft have been personally reviewed and rated by the Harris method and suggest that every "loose" hip must be assumed to be infected until proved otherwise.
Long-term results of revision total hip replacement. A follow-up report.
TLDR
There is an increased failure rate with longer follow-up of revision total hip replacement, and that progressive radiolucency at an interface indicates a poor prognosis for the arthroplasty.
Revision of Aseptic Loose Total Hip Arthroplasties
TLDR
Sixty-six patients revised for aseptic loosening of their conventional hip arthroplasties were revised, with a higher failure rate with dysplasia and post-traumatic patients, and a lower incidence in osteoarthritic and rheumatoid patients.
Results of revision for mechanical failure after cemented total hip replacement, 1979 to 1982. A two to five-year follow-up.
From January 1979 to February 1982, 143 patients (seventy-nine women and sixty-four men) with 146 uninfected cemented total hip arthroplasties had revision cemented hip arthroplasty at The Hospital…
Revision of nonseptic, loose, cemented femoral components using modern cementing techniques.
...
1
2
3
...