Logical Predictivism

@article{Martin2021LogicalP,
  title={Logical Predictivism},
  author={Ben Martin and Ole Thomassen Hjortland},
  journal={J. Philos. Log.},
  year={2021},
  volume={50},
  pages={285-318}
}
Motivated by weaknesses with traditional accounts of logical epistemology, considerable attention has been paid recently to the view, known as anti-exceptionalism about logic (AEL), that the subject matter and epistemology of logic may not be so different from that of the recognised sciences. One of the most prevalent claims made by advocates of AEL is that theory choice within logic is significantly similar to that within the sciences. This connection with scientific methodology highlights a… 

Anti-Exceptionalism about Logic and the Burden of Explanation

  • B. Martin
  • Philosophy
    Canadian Journal of Philosophy
  • 2021
Abstract Considerable attention recently has been paid to anti-exceptionalism about logic (AEL), the thesis that logic is more similar to the sciences in important respects than traditionally

Anti-exceptionalism about logic as tradition rejection

While anti-exceptionalism about logic (AEL) is now a popular topic within the philosophy of logic, there’s still a lack of clarity over what the proposal amounts to. currently, it is most common to

Anti-exceptionalism and methodological pluralism in logic

According to methodological anti-exceptionalism, logic follows a scientific methodology. There has been some discussion about which methodology logic has. Authors such as Priest, Hjortland and

Anti-exceptionalism and the justification of basic logical principles

Anti-exceptionalism about logic is the thesis that logic is not special. In this paper, I consider, and reject, a challenge to this thesis. According to this challenge, there are basic logical

Intuitions, theory choice and the ameliorative character of logical theories

Anti-exceptionalists about logic claim that logical methodology is not different from scientific methodology when it comes to theory choice. Two anti-exceptionalist accounts of theory choice in logic

The cost of closure: logical realism, anti-exceptionalism, and theoretical equivalence

Philosophers of science often assume that logically equivalent theories are theoretically equivalent. I argue that two theses, anti-exceptionalism about logic (which says, roughly, that logic is not

Logical Pluralism and Interpretations of Logical Systems

Logical pluralism is a general idea that there is more than one correct logic. Carnielli and Rodrigues [2019a] defend an epistemic interpretation of the paraconsistent logic N4, according to which an

Logic as a methodological discipline

This essay offers a conception of logic by which logic may be considered to be exceptional among the sciences on the backdrop of a naturalistic outlook. The conception of logic focused on emphasises

What is logical deflationism? Two non-metalinguistic conceptions of logic

This paper compares two ways of holding that logic is special among the sciences in that it has no restricted class of entities as its subject matter, but instead concerns all entities alike. One way

Is Philosophy Exceptional? A Corpus-Based, Quantitative Study

: Drawing on the epistemology of logic literature on anti-exceptionalism about logic, we set out to investigate the following metaphilosophical questions empirically: Is philosophy special? Are its

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 82 REFERENCES

Identifying logical evidence

TLDR
By looking at the types of evidence logicians actually appeal to in attempting to support their theories, this paper can provide a more detailed and realistic picture of logical epistemology.

Language, Truth and Logic

  • T. G.
  • Philosophy
    Nature
  • 1936
AbstractTHIS excellent compendium of the views and doctrines of the new positivism derived from the scientific empiricism of the Vienna circle and an extreme interpretation of the aims of logic, will

Anti-exceptionalism about logic

Logic isn’t special. Its theories are continuous with science; its method continuous with scientific method. Logic isn’t a priori, nor are its truths analytic truths. Logical theories are revisable,

The Justification of the Basic Laws of Logic

TLDR
This paper aims to answer the question of how beliefs in such attributions are justified, on both its descriptive and normative interpretations, and to make it plausible that beliefs formed this way really are justified.

LOGICAL NIHILISM: COULD THERE BE NO LOGIC?*

Logical monists and pluralists disagree about how many correct logics there are; the monists say there is just one, the pluralists that there are more. Could it turn out that both are wrong, and that

Logical Partisanhood

Abstract A natural suggestion and increasingly popular account of how to revise our logical beliefs treats revision of logic analogously to the revision of scientific theories (Hjortland, Priest,

Logic isn’t normative

Abstract Some writers object to logical pluralism on the grounds that logic is normative. The rough idea is that the relation of logical consequence has consequences for what we ought to think and

Frege's Notions of Self‐Evidence

Controversy remains over exactly why Frege aimed to estabish logicism. In this essay, I argue that the most influential interpretations of Frege's motivations fall short because they misunderstand or

Saving the phenomena

A according to a widely shared view of science, scientific theories predict and explain facts about "observables": objects and properties which can be perceived by the senses, sometimes augmented by

Deviance and Vice: Strength as a Theoretical Virtue in the Epistemology of Logic

This paper is about the putative theoretical virtue of strength, as it might be used in abductive arguments to the correct logic in the epistemology of logic. It argues for three theses. The first is
...