• DOI:10.1086/503058
• Corpus ID: 30375810

Logic for Designing Nature Reserves for Multiple Species

@article{McCarthy2006LogicFD,
  title={Logic for Designing Nature Reserves for Multiple Species},
  author={Michael A. McCarthy and C. J. Thompson and Nicholas S. G. Williams},
  journal={The American Naturalist},
  year={2006},
  volume={167},
  pages={717 - 727}
}

• M. McCarthy, C. Thompson, N. S. Williams
• Published 23 March 2006
• Environmental Science
• The American Naturalist

We examine the logic of designing nature reserves to understand better how to integrate the concepts of representativeness and persistence. Simple models of viability are used to evaluate how the expected number of species in the reserve system changes with variation in the risk of extinction among species, their rate of occurrence, and the distribution of species. The optimal size of individual reserves increased with the mean and variance of the probability of extinction among species and with the rate at which the risk of extinction declines with the cost of each reserve. In contrast, the rate of occurrence of species within reserves and their rate of accumulation with increasing reserve area had a relatively minor influence on the optimal size of reserves. Patterns of endemism were most important for the location of reserves. Including differences among species in the analysis reduced the optimal number of individual reserves (and increased the size of each) when operating under a fixed budget compared with reserve designs based on single species. A case study in the city of Melbourne, Australia, demonstrates the conservation value of small (∼1 ha) grassland reserves and the underrepresentation of Melbourne’s volcanic plains in the region’s conservation network.