List of Lists: A Compilation of International Corporate Reputation Ratings

  title={List of Lists: A Compilation of International Corporate Reputation Ratings},
  author={Charles J. Fombrun},
  journal={Corporate Reputation Review},
  • C. Fombrun
  • Published 7 July 2007
  • Business
  • Corporate Reputation Review
Companies are constantly being rated by one group or another. A companys relative standing across lists opens a partial window on the reputation landscape in which companies operate. Reputation Institute identified and examined some 183 public lists that provide summary ratings and rankings of companies in 38 countries. This note provides readers with an overview of this list of lists. The majority of the lists we found were based on either a measure of overall reputation or of the workplace… 

The effects of corporate reputation perceptions of the general public on shareholder value

Superior corporate reputations can have strategic value for firms. Of the “multiple reputations” associated with each firm, we focus on the perceptions of the general public. The public represents

Under Construction: How Commensuration and Management Fashion Affect Corporate Reputation Rankings

Evidence is found consistent with hypotheses that when asked to quantify corporate reputation, audiences rely heavily on traditional as well as emerging nontraditional measures of financial performance as they become more fashionable indicators of superior financial performance.

Corporate reputation management in the US pharmaceutical industry

The reputations of firms may be linked to the degree to which they have formal reputation management programs. To examine that hypothesis the authors surveyed firms in the U.S. pharmaceutical

Corporate Reputation and Economic Performance : the Evidence from Poland

ABSTRACT. Corporate reputation, based on factors such as corporate social responsibility (CSR), became a signal for investors. However, in some countries it seems, that profits are the most important

Reputation and legitimacy: accreditation and rankings to assess organizations

A key perspective on reputation is that of assessment. Much of the communication literature focuses on the influence organizations have on impression formation. This chapter however suggests that in

Director’s perspectives on the meaning and dimensions of corporate reputation

The purpose of this research is to explore the perspectives of directors to determine how they define, perceive, value, build and manage corporate reputation. A qualitative research design was

Managing Reputational Risk: Insights from an European Survey

It could be argued that the management of reputational risk should be a key business priority. Yet despite recognition in previous studies that the risk related to reputation is critical, concrete

Toward a Comprehensive Understanding of Corporate Reputation: Concept, Measurement and Implications

Corporate reputation is more important than ever. The highly turbulent business environment, increased public expectations, and pressure from different stakeholder groups have all contributed to the

The development of a new instrument to measure client-based corporate reputation in the service industry

The link between a favourable corporate reputation and business benefits is well established. Most executives recognise the importance of a favourable corporate reputation in building a competitive



Reputation: Realizing Value from the Corporate Image

Introduction: why reputations matter. Part 1 The hidden value of a good reputation: going for the gold what's in a name? enlightened self-interest reputational capital the Midas touch shaping

Celebrity Firms: The Social Construction Of Market Popularity

We extend the concept of celebrity from the individual to the firm level of analysis and argue that the high level of public attention and the positive emotional responses that define celebrity

Constructing competitive advantage: The role of firm-constituent interactions

Current models of competitive advantage emphasize economic factors as explanations for a firm’s success but ignore sociocognitive factors. This paper integrates economic and cognitive perspectives,

Reputation Study – Chile China Hong Kong Council of Social Service Caring Company Award 2005 Shanghai Securities News

  • 2005