Linnaeus's Last Stand?

@article{Pennisi2001LinnaeussLS,
  title={Linnaeus's Last Stand?},
  author={Elizabeth Pennisi},
  journal={Science},
  year={2001},
  volume={291},
  pages={2304 - 2307}
}
A small but powerful contingent of systematists is challenging more than 2 centuries of taxonomic tradition by proposing a new system for naming and classifying life, one they say is more in line with the current understanding of evolution. Their brash proposal, which will be debated at a symposium in Washington, D.C., on 30 and 31 March, has raised the ire of the more conservative leaders in the field, who maintain that the shortcomings of the old system and the advantages of the new one… 
Should paleontologists use “phylogenetic” nomenclature?
  • G. Dyke
  • Biology
    Journal of Paleontology
  • 2002
TLDR
A few areas of PN that make it an especially problematic proposal for paleontologists are highlighted.
Naming taxa from cladograms: a cautionary tale.
  • A. Dubois
  • Biology
    Molecular phylogenetics and evolution
  • 2007
The International Code of Zoological Nomenclature must be drastically improved before it is too late
TLDR
It is argued here that if the Code of the 21st century does not evolve to incorporate these changes, it will prove unable to play its role in front of several important recent theoretical and practical developments of taxonomy and run the risk of being abandoned by a part of the international community of zootaxonomists.
A revised classification of Santalales
TLDR
A revised classification of Santalales, an angiosperm order that contains 18 families, 160 genera, and over 2200 species, brings together all currently available information that contributes to the understanding of relationships among these plants.
WHAT IS THE WRITER OF A FLORA TO DO? EVOLUTIONARY TAXONOMY OR PHYLOGENETIC SYSTEMATICS?
TLDR
It is argued that, for both practical and theoretical reasons, a modified traditional system (binomial nomenclature, ranked hierarchies) be used in floras (allowing paraphyletic groups but eliminating all polyphyletics groups despite some nomenClatural instability).
Does nomenclatural availability of nomina of new species or subspecies require the deposition of vouchers in collections
TLDR
It is supported here the view that practice of naming new species or subspecies without material onomatophores is not doing a service to the discipline of taxonomy as illustrations, DNA sequences or “definitions” cannot replace voucher specimens.
Are the linnean and phylogenetic nomenclatural systems combinable? Recommendations for biological nomenclature.
TLDR
It is seen as essential that species binomen, including the formal rank of genus, are retained, and species should continue to be linked to type specimens and the use of other formal ranks should be minimized.
Nomenclatural issues in ornithology: the incredible controversy on the identity of a long overlooked Brazilian bird.
TLDR
It is argued that for now the nomen Scytalopus speluncae should be applied to the only species known to occur in the vicinities of the type locality, as established by the author of the species.
SHOULD PALEONTOLOGISTS USE “PHYLOGENETIC” NOMENCLATURE?
TLDR
A look at a few areas of PN that make it an especially problematic proposal for paleontology in particular.
THE AMPHIBIAN TREE OF LIFE
TLDR
A new taxonomy of living amphibians is proposed to correct the deficiencies of the old one, based on the largest phylogenetic analysis of living Amphibia so far accomplished, and many subsidiary taxa are demonstrated to be nonmonophyletic.
...
1
2
3
4
5
...