Limits of Knowledge and the Limited Importance of Trust

  title={Limits of Knowledge and the Limited Importance of Trust},
  author={Lennart Sj{\"o}berg},
  journal={Risk Analysis},
  • L. Sjöberg
  • Published 1 February 2001
  • Political Science
  • Risk Analysis
Perceived risk and related attitudes have been implicated as major factors in many of the difficult policy problems that face modern society (nuclear power, genetically modified food, etc). Experts often argue that no or very small risks are involved; people are still worried. Why? The standard answer is lack of trust. Data on trust and risk perception, however, point to only a weak relationship between the two (r approximately 0.3). It is suggested here that the reason for the surprisingly… 

Too much trust in (social) trust? The importance of epistemic concerns and perceived antagonism

Social trust has often been claimed to be an important determinant of perceived risk, a finding that, if true, has important consequences for risk communication. However, the empirical basis of the

Perception of risk: the influence of general trust, and general confidence

The influence of trust and confidence as personality traits on the perception of various hazards was examined. The distinction between trust and confidence is a key element of certain theories of

Trust, Confidence and Cooperation model: a framework for understanding the relation between trust and Risk Perception

The nature of the relation between trust and Risk Perception (RP) has recently become a focus of increased interest among risk management researchers. Some argue that trust is strongly related to RP

Trust and Risk Perception: A Critical Review of the Literature

  • M. Siegrist
  • Business
    Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis
  • 2019
It is concluded that the importance of trust varies by hazard and respondent group and there is a need for a better understanding about the factors that determine which heuristics people rely on when evaluating hazards.

Risk perception is not what it seems: The psychometric paradigm revisited

Risk perception has become an important topic to policy makers concerned with technology and the environment, and the psychological analysis of this construct has attracted much interest.

Perceived information technology risks and attitudes

It is held that it is unlikely that IT will become a stigmatized technology, partly because it is seen as irreplaceable, and the replaceability of a technology is an important factor when it comes to attitudes toward technology.

Risk Perception by Politicians and the Public

Risk perception by local politicians responsible for health and the environment is compared to that of the public in two large, representative samples, and to a group of nuclear waste management

Trust, acceptance and knowledge of technological and environmental hazards in Chile

Studies over the past decade have found empirical links between trust in risk management institutions and the risk perceptions and acceptability of various individual hazards. Mostly addressing food


Extensive research on risk perception has led to a received view (the psychometric model or paradigm), which stresses that members of the public react negatively to technology whenever it (a) is new,



Risk Communication, Knowledge, and Attitudes: Explaining Reactions to a Technology Perceived as Risky

Several factors influence peoples’decisions about food irradiation, a technology perceived as risky. Responses to questions about three dimensions of acceptability of food irradiation provide the

The Determinants of Trust and Credibility in Environmental Risk Communication: An Empirical Study

One such finding was that defying a negative stereotype is key to improving perceptions of trust and credibility.

Risk perception and the location of a repository for spent nuclear fuel.

The more positive one's attitude towards nuclear power is and the more trust one has in experts and authorities, the lower one's risk perception is, and reactions were expected to vary with distance between the home district and the location of a repository.

Perceived risk, trust, and democracy

Risk management has become increasingly politicized and contentious. Polarized views, controversy, and overt conflict have become pervasive. Risk†perception research has recently begun to provide a

Trust as a Determinant of Opposition to a High‐Level Radioactive Waste Repository: Analysis of a Structural Model

Residents in the State of Nevada hold strong opinions about the federal government`s proposal to site the nation`s first high-level radioactive waste repository at Yucca Mountain. The model developed

Determinants of Risk Perceptions of a Hazardous Waste Site

A before-stimulus-after quasi-experimental design is used to assess the factors relating to risk perceptions of a hazardous waste site. First, a pretest obtains measures of attitudes and beliefs

Specifying factors in radiation risk perception.

  • L. Sjöberg
  • Psychology
    Scandinavian journal of psychology
  • 2000
It was found that risk perception could be well explained with this approach and the importance of Tampering with Nature, as well as specific perceived risk, were stressed.

Specifying Factors in Radiation Risk Perception1

This is a study of risk perception and a test of a model of perceived risk. A scale measuring fear was factor analyzed and the resulting five fear factors were related to a large number of risk

Social Distrust as a Factor in Siting Hazardous Facilities and Communicating Risks

Conflicts regarding the siting of hazardous facilities in the U.S. have often led to an impasse due to numerous problems, particularly including social distrust. To address this situation, this

Worry and Risk Perception

  • L. Sjöberg
  • Psychology
    Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis
  • 1998
Results reported here show that perceived risk and worry are indeed weakly correlated, both for generalized worry and for more specific measures of worry matched with the same hazard as risk ratings.