Lifting the veil: improving accountability and social transparency in Wikipedia with wikidashboard

@inproceedings{Suh2008LiftingTV,
  title={Lifting the veil: improving accountability and social transparency in Wikipedia with wikidashboard},
  author={Bongwon Suh and Ed H. Chi and Aniket Kittur and Bryan A. Pendleton},
  booktitle={CHI},
  year={2008}
}
Wikis are collaborative systems in which virtually anyone can edit anything. Although wikis have become highly popular in many domains, their mutable nature often leads them to be distrusted as a reliable source of information. Here we describe a social dynamic analysis tool called WikiDashboard which aims to improve social transparency and accountability on Wikipedia articles. Early reactions from users suggest that the increased transparency afforded by the tool can improve the interpretation… Expand
Can you ever trust a wiki?: impacting perceived trustworthiness in wikipedia
TLDR
Examination of whether a visualization that exposes hidden article information can impact readers' perceptions of trustworthiness in a wiki environment suggests that surfacing information relevant to the stability of the article and the patterns of editor behavior can have a significant impact on users' trust across a variety of page types. Expand
Social transparency in networked information exchange: a theoretical framework
TLDR
This framework builds upon multiple streams of research, including prior work in CSCW on social translucence, awareness, and visual analytics, to describe three dimensions of online behavior that can be made transparent. Expand
Measuring wiki viability: an empirical assessment of the social dynamics of a large sample of wikis
This paper assesses the content- and population-dynamics of a large sample of wikis, over a timespan of several months, in order to identify basic features that may predict or induce different typesExpand
Social Transparency in Networked Information Exchange: A Framework and Research Question
TLDR
This framework builds upon multiple streams of research, including prior work in CSCW on social translucence, awareness, and visual analytics, to describe three dimensions of online behavior that can be made transparent. Expand
NICE: social translucence through UI intervention
TLDR
It is suggested that simple interface modifications (such as informing Wikipedians that the editor they are reverting is a newcomer) can have substantial positive effects in protecting against contribution loss in newcomers and improving the quality of work done by more experienced contributors. Expand
Wikipedian Self-Governance in Action: Motivating the Policy Lens
TLDR
This work focuses on the enactment and creation of Wikipedian policies in discussions on the talk pages that accompany each article, finding that policies are widely used by registered users and administrators, that their use is converging and stabilizing in and across these groups, and that theirUse illustrates the growing importance of certain classes of work, in particular source attribution. Expand
whoVIS: Visualizing Editor Interactions and Dynamics in Collaborative Writing Over Time
The visualization of editor interaction dynamics and provenance of content in revisioned, collaboratively written documents has the potential to allow for more transparency and intuitiveExpand
Transparency, Control, and Content Generation on Wikipedia: Editorial Strategies and Technical Affordances
The sparse nature of Wikipedia’s main content interface, dominated by clearly laid out content, neatly organized into information boxes, and structured into headings and subheadings projects an imageExpand
Building for social translucence: a domain analysis and prototype system
TLDR
A domain analysis is conducted to understand the space of architectural support required to facilitate social translucence in systems and describes an instantiation of those requirements as a system architecture that relies on data from Wikipedia and illustrates how translucences can be propagated to some basic visualizations which are created for Wikipedia users. Expand
WikipediaViz: Conveying article quality for casual Wikipedia readers
TLDR
WikipediaViz introduces five visual indicators integrated to the Wikipedia layout that can keep casual Wikipedia readers aware of important metainformation about the articles they read to provide the readers with important clues about the editing process at a glance. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 18 REFERENCES
Studying cooperation and conflict between authors with history flow visualizations
TLDR
This paper investigates the dynamics of Wikipedia, a prominent, thriving wiki, and focuses on the relevance of authorship, the value of community surveillance in ameliorating antisocial behavior, and how authors with competing perspectives negotiate their differences. Expand
Wikipedia risks
The Wikipedia (WP; en.wikipedia.org/wiki/) applies the wiki technology (from a Hawaiian word for “quick”) to the encyclopedia, a venerable form of knowledge organization and dissemination. WikipediaExpand
Assessing Information Quality of a Community-Based Encyclopedia
TLDR
This work proposes seven IQ metrics which can be evaluated automatically and test the set on a representative sample of Wikipedia content, along with a number of statistical characterizations of Wikipedia articles, their content construction, process metadata and social context. Expand
Cooperation and quality in wikipedia
TLDR
It is shown that Wikipedia articles accrete edits according to a simple stochastic mechanism in which edits beget edits, and Topics of high interest or relevance are thus naturally brought to the forefront of quality. Expand
Social translucence: designing social infrastructures that make collective activity visible
TLDR
Making social cues visible and persistent helps online groups govern their activities and helps them understand each other and act accordingly. Expand
Why you can't cite Wikipedia in my class
TLDR
The online encyclopedia's method of adding information risks conflating facts with popular opinion, so as to not overwhelm readers with too much information. Expand
Internet encyclopaedias go head to head
Jimmy Wales' Wikipedia comes close to Britannica in terms of the accuracy of its science entries, a Nature investigation finds.  UPDATE: see details of how the data were collected for this article inExpand
A content-driven reputation system for the wikipedia
TLDR
The results show that the notion of reputation has good predictive value: changes performed by low-reputation authors have a significantly larger than average probability of having poor quality, as judged by human observers, and of being later undone, as measured by the algorithms. Expand
ManyEyes: a Site for Visualization at Internet Scale
TLDR
The design and deployment of Many Eyes is described, a public Web site where users may upload data, create interactive visualizations, and carry on discussions to support collaboration around visualizations at a large scale by fostering a social style of data analysis. Expand
Reputation systems
Systems T he Internet offers vast new opportunities to interact with total strangers. These interactions can be fun, informative, even profitable. But they also involve risk. Is the advice of aExpand
...
1
2
...